Many Trinity County residents are attuned to the annual water year forecasting prepared by the California Department of Water Resources, also known as the Bulletin 120 or B-120. Every year, the department gathers real time water accumulation information, snowpack data and uses modeling to forecast what to expect for the major snow bearing watersheds in California. The water bean counting starts October 1 (the nominal beginning of California’s wet season) with a final determination April 10 each year. The forecasts are broken up into several regions throughout California with the Trinity River at Lewiston Lake forecast filed under the North Coast Hydrologic Region.  The ultimate goal of the B-120 is to value expected amounts of water inflow to storage locations around the state. These data makes it possible for water managers to make local informed decisions about potential floods, the amount of water that can be released from reservoir systems, as well as what type of dry season residents and fire agencies could expect within their regions.

For the Trinity River Restoration Program, the April B-120 forecast determines the water year allocation for our yearly restoration flow releases, which were outlined in the 1999 Flow Study Evaluation and adopted in the 2000 Department of Interior – Record of Decision. These five water year types that determine the amount of water released to the river from year to year are categorized as Critically Dry, Dry, Normal, Wet and Extremely Wet. You can see the relative allocation for restoration purposes in the table below.

It is interesting to note that the State’s April B-120 has only overpredicted the water year type once, in 2008.  Currently the allocation for river restoration is the only conditioned amount of water released from Trinity & Lewiston Reservoir; where the Restoration Program’s yearly allocation is limited by water year type, the Central Valley Project can divert any amount in any water year type, usually diverting less in wetter years and more in drier years. Safety of dams releases and water releases to the Trinity River for ceremonial purposes or for Klamath River mitigation purposes are not part of the restoration release volume.

As mentioned above the State’s forecast uses a few different methods to determine how much water to expect as inflow into Trinity & Lewiston Reservoir. The most story-worthy data collection type are the on-the-ground, snow surveys which are conducted during a short window every February, March, April and May. The Trinity Alps snow surveys are led by two agencies: The U.S. Forest Service who motor in via snow Cat to several locations in the Trinity Alps Wilderness, and an expert group of backcountry cross country skiers led by The Watershed Research and Training Center. There are nearly a dozen survey courses established throughout the Trinity River watershed and these sites have been measured in exactly the same locations since the 1940s.

Each year The Watershed Center sends out a small team of between two and four backcountry skiers to travel through the Alps Wilderness and measure snowpack at three survey courses: Shimmy Lake, Red Rock Mountain, and Bear Basin. Once the team reaches a survey location, they drive a specialized aluminum tube tool called the Mt. Rose Sampler, into the snowpack until they hit ground. “It takes a few times to get used to doing it,” says Josh Smith who has been conducting surveys in the Alps since 2011, with the first full recorded season in 2012. The surveyors use the tool to measure the height of the snow, then carefully extract the tube from the snowpack and weigh the snow-filled tube using a handheld scale. These measurements allow the surveyors to calculate the Snow Water Equivalent in designated transects within the three courses for which their team is responsible for. The State uses the hand measurements from the snow survey teams to bolster additional data taken from unmanned sensors located across and just outside of the watershed. These data sources together feed into a model that predicts the volume of water that will flow into Trinity Reservoir that year.

That said, the Watershed Center is looking for local Trinity County residents who believe they have a sufficient mental and physical stamina to participate in this long-standing Trinity County tradition. “We get a lot of calls from people who think this is right for them,” Josh continues, “most people only come out once, and then they are done. It’s a real suffer-fest.”

If you’d like to learn more, please reach out to Josh Smith at the Watershed Training and Research Center by calling (530) 628-4206.

While it has not been a focus of the TRRP for many years, infrastructure improvement was one of the foundational tasks that was laid out in the 2000 Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration Record of Decision. Years of low, predictable flows had led riparian property owners to develop very close to the river’s edge. In order to implement restoration releases, the TRRP has worked with willing property owners to upgrade or remove infrastructure that could be damaged by restoration flow releases as guided by the “maximum fisheries flow” boundary.

The maximum fisheries flow is an 11,000 cubic feet per second release from Lewiston Dam (the highest the program can target for restoration objectives) that coincides with a major spring storm event. In the program’s first decade, there was a big push to address permitted infrastructure to clear the floodplain for fisheries releases; we moved roads, replaced several bridges, upgraded dozens of septic and water intake systems, and relocated a house in Douglas City. Another house (391 River Acres Rd in Junction City) was identified as being inside of the maximum fisheries flow boundary, but the owners were not interested in improving or selling their home at that time.

The circumstances changed in the late 2010’s when the house sold to a new owner who used it as a fishing cabin and was very interested in finding a mutual solution that would benefit Trinity River fisheries. Together with engineers and architects the landowner and TRRP explored moving the house, building a levee, and elevating the living area with a flow-through bottom story. In the end, none of those solutions proved feasible due to flood concerns with adjoining properties and other constraints. The situation led the homeowner to decide to sell the house to the Bureau of Reclamation, who acquired the property in 2023.

In March of 2024, Cal Inc., a certified small business located in Vacaville, California was awarded the contract to demolish the 391 River Acres structures. Cal, Inc., specializes in general construction, abatement and remediation services, and environmental and safety training, and it took their professional staff only a few weeks to gather intel, test for lead and asbestos, and mobilize machinery, crew and subcontractors to begin the demolition.

Over the course of the week many of the neighbors wandered over and reminisced about those who had called the River Acres house home (or home away from home) over the years.  They were understandably sad about losing a piece of River Acres history but were excited about the open space for their dogs and grandchildren to run and play in. We appreciate their tolerance of the noise, construction and extra visits these past few months. The project will be considered complete once the bare areas have been mulched and seeded, likely to be fully complete by the first of May.

Not only is the hyporheic zone an area that supports great biodiversity, in a 2005 study this zone was also coined the “river’s liver” from findings that carbon and nitrogen cycling in the river was “controlled by the live sediments of the central river channel, which thus represent a “liver function” in the river’s metabolism.”[1] So, the hyporheic zone acts as a filtering mechanism for the river, and an area of rich biodiversity. But that’s not all!

The hyporheic zone provides a multitude of functions and it is critically important to the health of our waterways. Because the hyporheic zone acts as a filtration system through its porous sediments, it also promotes higher levels of dissolved oxygen through photosynthesis. Dissolved oxygen in waterways support anadromous fish species like chinook, steelhead and coho salmon by helping them to maintain a healthy respiratory function.

When Trinity River salmon return to spawn, they dig redds (or nests) to lay their eggs in. The female fish flaps her tail sideways into the river bed, digging down around 12″ to 14″ into the hyporheic zone. After the eggs are laid and fertilized, she covers them with rocks. These rocks protect the eggs and newly hatched alevin from predators. The eggs location in the hyporheic zone provides water flow that flushes metabolic wastes during egg development and provide dissolved oxygen for her embryos to breathe.

The presence of dissolved oxygen, protection from predators, and microvegetation for food makes the hyporheic zone a biologic hotspot for macroinvertebrates. While the insects nestle down in between rocks they feed on leaves, algae, and twigs. In a healthy hyporheic zone where flow and sediments are correctly combined the area supports an abundance of food for the macroinvertebrates which in turn supports an abundance of food for juvenile and adult salmon. And that’s not all! Due to the interaction with upwelling cooler ground water, hyporheic zones help to moderate stream temperatures during the lower flow summer and fall months.

The Significance of the Hyporheic in the Trinity River

The hyporheic zone covers the entire streambed and bank areas of a river bottom and the ability to perform its natural functions are influenced by many things. Some influences include whether the stream is straight or meanders, if there are any obstacles in the channel, such as log, boulder, or even the pier support for a bridge. Factors also include whether the stream has a single channel or multiple channels, and also how porous the streambed sediments are. For example, near Lewiston Dam where there are very few fine sediments, large amounts of the river’s flow go subsurface because they are conveyed in the hyporheic zone. This is an unnatural situation because the river requires all sized sediments, from sand and silt up to cobbles and boulders. So while semi-open pore spaces in the bed are desirable, if the pore spaces are fully open do to the lack of fines in the bed, salmon eggs will jiggle around in redds and die from abrasion as well as the speed of flow between rocks in the hyporheic zone will be too fast for microvegetation to grow and macroinvertebrates to live.

Thus, to combat a static river system, since 2000, the Trinity River Restoration Program has focused efforts around replenishing the critical building blocks of a river. This is achieved by gravel additions in the upper river, large wood placements along river banks and a yearly spring snowmelt hydrograph that is released from Lewiston Dam. Also, since the Trinity was heavily impacted by hydraulic and dredge mining the program allocates funds for watershed restoration and gives great attention to the diversification of channels and floodplains with mechanical rehabilitation.

These things combined help the dammed Trinity in healing itself, however, many gains are yet to be made with restoration and management. For example, Todd Buxton, PhD, is starting a three year study of the hyporheic zone in the Trinity River. The study will construct a mathematical model to simulate the flow rates and directions, temperatures, and dissolved oxygen in the hyporheic zone. At the same time, macroinvertebrates in the hyporheic zone will be measured where the study is being conducted at sites within the 40-mile restoration reach. This information will be used to develop a statistical model for predicting the density and species composition of macroinvertebrates based on the above characteristics in the hyporheic zone, since these aspects have a strong role in determining how many and what species of macroinvertebrates may be present. Application of the paired models will then enable scientists to better understand how surface flows and temperatures in the river can be better managed to promote macroinvertebrate populations and increase the availability of food for salmon.

Additionally, the program has made significant gains with increases in outmigrating salmon smolts since 2000, but these fish are not returning home at the rates that were observed before this year. Scientist have identified that the Program’s current management of flow timing could be a critical limiting factor for the fish of the Trinity River. If juvenile fish had more food available to them when they are emerging from their nests they may enter the ocean more robust. If elevated flows from the dam are timed with winter storms, then the Trinity River could add to the power of the tributary flows to increase mainstem water levels to prevent delta creation while simultaneously preventing sediments from smothering redds and other important living organisms within the hyporheic zone.

Understanding this unique area has been a challenge for river scientists because the hyporheic function is expansive. It is also unique to each river system and crosses over many scientific disciplines. The zone not only intrigues those interested in studying the microbiome of a river system, but also includes; ecologists, geomorphologists, hydrologists and environmental engineers, just to name a few. With each discipline and study within, scientists learn more and more about the fascinating world that exists beneath and alongside a river’s bed and how river restorationists can better understand to allow it to flourish.

References

Hyporheic Zone, Wikipedia

Lewandowski, J.; Arnon, S.; Banks, E.; Batelaan, O.; Betterle, A.; Broecker, T.; Coll, C.; Drummond, J.D.; Gaona Garcia, J.; Galloway, J.; et al. Is the Hyporheic Zone Relevant beyond the Scientific Community? Water 2019, 11, 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112230

The Significance of the Hyporheic Zone, Jana Hemphill, Deschutes Land Trust, 2021.

Citations

[1] Fischer, H.; Kloep, F.; Wilzcek, S.; Pusch, M.T. A river’s liver–microbial processes within the hyporheic zone of a large lowland river. Biogeochemistry 2005, 76, 349–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Freshwater Mussels in the Trinity River

Freshwater mussels are considered to be one of the most sensitive and threatened aquatic species within Northwestern watersheds. In North America, there are 297 known freshwater mussel species. Nearly three-quarters of these are considered imperiled, and more than 35 species have gone extinct in the last century. Eight species are known to exist west of the Continental Divide. Mussels have a fascinating life history strategy, which involves parasitizing on fish during their larval stage, and can live to be over 100 years old. They are considered an indicator species, like the good ole canary in a coal mine, as they require pristine water quality to thrive.

Life History, Strategy and Anatomy

To the unknowing eye, freshwater mussels look very similar to saltwater mussels as they are both bivalves, meaning they have 2 shells connected with a hinge. They are also both filter feeders and both belong to the class Bivalvia in the phylum Mollusca. Despite being named and shaped similarly, saltwater mussels, are however more closely related to oysters and scallops than they are to freshwater mussels, and thus have developed different evolutionary strategies. Saltwater mussels use a byssus thread to attach themselves to underwater structures, while freshwater mussels use a foot to move short distances and bury themselves. There are also differences in their sexual reproduction strategies. Saltwater mussels reproduce by ejecting the sperm and the eggs into the water column, where they fertilize and develop. With freshwater mussels, on the other hand, the sperm is ejected into the water column and inhaled by a female mussel downstream. The egg is then fertilized within a special part of the female mussel’s gills, and she exhales the baby mussels (called glochidia) after they are developed.

All freshwater mussels have:

• a hinge, which connects the two shells
• a raised, rounded area along the dorsal edge called, a beak
• a foot used for motion and feeding
• a thin sheet of tissue that envelopes the body within the shell, called a mantle
• and inhalant/exhalant features along said mantle

Some mussels have pseudocardinal teeth, which are short, stout structures below the beak. There are many more features with very technical names, but these are the most useful anatomical structures for identification in our region.

Western pearlshell mussel (Margaritifera falcata)

In the Trinity River, there is one confirmed species of freshwater mussel – the Western pearlshell mussel (Margaritifera falcata), which have very prominent pseudocardinal teeth. The Klamath River has also documented populations of the Western ridged mussel (Gonidia angulata), which have an obvious ridge on the outside of the shell, and floaters (Anodonta spp.) which are small and have neither teeth nor ridges.

Western pearlshell mussels are known as being the longest-lived and slowest-growing mussel species in North America. In fact, they are the oldest freshwater invertebrates in the world. Their age can be estimated by counting the growth rings on their shells, similar to the growth rings on trees. The black, concentric rings are thought to represent winter rest periods. Some Western pearlshells have been documented to live over 100 years, meaning that some of these mollusks may have been in our river since it was buzzing with dredgers and mining activity in the early 1900s.

Similar to salmonid migration, in which the salmon return to their natal stream, mussels can identify ideal locations to drop from their host and landing in existing beds of freshwater mussels. This life stage is one of the most fascinating aspects of this species. Originally the larval stage mussels were thought to be an entirely different parasitic invertebrate species yet scientists recently realized they are actually freshwater mussels in an immature life phase. Other species of mussels may parasitize different parts of their host fish, with some sending worm-like tendrils into the fish’s gills to sap vital resources. However, it is not thought that the mussels have a significant impact on the health of their host fish.

Pearlshell species can release their glochidia in aggregates, called conglutinates, which are bound by mucus. They seem to reproduce in spring and summer, though few studies have been conducted on the life cycle of our Western pearlshells. Though there is no scientifically defined relationship between water temperature and spawning (due to a lack of study), it has been observed in a study conducted in the state of Washington that mussels in warmer waters spawn earlier than those in cooler waters.

Ecological Benefits

Freshwater mussels have many benefits to stream ecology and have a major influence on the aquatic food web. They are filter feeders and they have separate orifices for inhaling and exhaling, which is how they derive nutrients. They filter tiny, suspended particles, including sediment, algae, bacteria and zooplankton out of the water column. Some of these particles are bound to larger particles within the mussels and expelled, where they sink to the bottom and feed benthic macroinvertebrates. Individuals in some species of freshwater mussels can filter up to 15 gallons of water per day, reducing turbidity and improving water quality. This cycling of nutrients also supports the growth of emergent plants, fostering a riparian habitat that benefits salmonids, which mussels are dependent upon. To be cliché, it’s all connected.

Freshwater mussels also help increase the exchange of nutrients, including oxygen, between sediments and the water column, in a similar mechanism to earthworms in the soil. They increase sediment porosity and allow the sediment to retain more organic matter. This ultimately improves the quality of aquatic habitat, allowing for a higher diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates.

Though not known for being a delicious treat to humans, mussels are an important food source for otters, raccoons and skunks. Healthy mussel populations are unaffected by natural predation, but low populations may be at risk of extirpation, and overly high populations may encourage excessive predator populations.

Trinity River Mussel Surveys and Conservation

In 2020, the Bureau of Land Management conducted a qualitative study of freshwater mussels on the Trinity River. A crew surveyed the upper 40 miles below Lewiston Dam and identified mussel beds as high, medium, and low density, and marked their locations on a map. This effort helps inform necessary conservation actions on project sites. If a mussel bed is known to be directly or indirectly affected from restoration activities, the Best Management Practice is to relocate a percentage of the population to an existing mussel bed upstream of their current location.

Relocation of freshwater mussels can be a tricky business. The species are incredibly sensitive to temperature and water quality conditions, so efforts must be conducted with efficiency and special care. It’s important to avoid moving mussels during certain times of the year when they are the most sensitive, which is when they are in their reproductive stages between December and July.

The long lived and sensitive nature of freshwater mussels is one reason it’s important to manage the Trinity River for long term impacts. Since mussels cannot move quickly to escape suboptimal conditions, their population fluctuations can reflect cumulative effects of environmental conditions, so studying and understanding freshwater mussels can be indicative of some aspects of riverine health. Despite being rather uncharismatic and tremendously understudied, the role that freshwater mussels play within aquatic ecosystems is invaluable.

When you go down to the river, it’s hard to ignore the assortment of sediment on the bed and banks – from sand and silt, to gravel, to larger cobbles, to the largest of boulders. Seeing rocks that contrast so strongly with the rough, jagged ones in the surrounding hills might beg the question – how did these get here, where did they come from, and how long ago did they arrive?

If a rock is rounded, more likely than not [1] it was transported by the river in a series of floods, originated from higher up in the watershed. Depending on the size these rocks may have arrived recently – perhaps as recently as the last flood. Large, rounded boulders that appear to be too large to have been rolled down the river on their own may have been in place since the last natural 100-year or 500-year flood and may remain there forever, or at least as long as Trinity and Lewiston dams are in place.

---

[1] Gold miners washed much sediment into Trinity River valleys from ancient riverbeds created from tectonic lifting that are presently high up on mountain slopes.

A river’s function

Besides the ecological benefits that rivers provide us, they have two pivotal functions in nature – to move water and to move sediment from the mountains to the ocean (the process is illustrated below). As both water and sediment flow downstream, they interact with each other to create a mosaic of pools, riffles, runs, islands, meanders, bars, and all of the other physical features that draw people, plants, and animals to a river.

The Trinity Watershed is situated in a relatively young, steep, and highly erodible mountain range, and is therefore blessed with a plentiful supply of sediment. A healthy sediment supply is beneficial to fish, invertebrates, and floodplain vegetation. However, due to the placement of two dams in the Trinity River’s upper watershed an important element of restoration is giving gravel to the system below a dam since the river’s natural sediment supply is blocked. We know rivers below dams need a replenished sediment supply, however, a key question that geomorphologists continue to study is how much sediment, and what size distribution of sediment should be added? These factors are difficult to determine and are constantly being re-evaluated as part of our adaptive management program.

How we calculate amounts for placement

Gravel augmentations to the river are first determined using a defined sediment budget specific to the Trinity. Also, at some point below most dams, a river’s tributaries provide a sufficient supply of sediment to support the physical processes and biologic populations in the river. On the Trinity, that point is considered to be just below the junction of Indian Creek. In years past, during floods, the amount of sediment moving along the bottom of the river (called ‘bedload’) was directly measured with large strainers placed on the riverbed. Data obtained from the strainer monitoring station have indicated that minor floods may move 2,000-3,000 tons of bedload (the monitoring station that is nearest to Indian Creek is located just upstream of Douglas City campground). At this same location, larger floods may move 15,000-30,000 tons of bedload past the monitoring station. The Trinity Record of decision provided the program with a framework of how much sediment should be applied to the river below the dam with the expectation that geomorphologists study current conditions through time and then adapt management based on results found.

After many years of physically sampling bedloads, program scientists switched to a more efficient and safer technique called acoustical monitoring. This method uses underwater microphones to quantify the amount of sediment during floods by measuring the amount of noise generated by rocks rolling on the bed. The physical data collected from the past is then compared to the measured volume of noise and produces a calculated volume of sediment rolling past. Scientists then scale annual sediment augmentation projects to these measured amounts. Additionally, the riverbed is periodically surveyed below sediment augmentation sites to determine whether the effects of placements are positive or negative. If too much sediment is noted, this information is used to scale back future sediment augmentation plans. If you were to compare the original amounts of sediment proposed in the Trinity Record of Decision to what we add today, ROD volumes were 2-3 times higher!

Size matters

As for size, the high end of the size distribution of sediments is the grain diameter that salmon can move to construct redds, or nests in which they place their eggs for incubation. Salmon can spawn in gravels with a median diameter up to about 10% of their body length. This leads to gravel being placed in the river that was filtered through a 4-inch screen. The lower end of the size distribution of sediment for redd building is considered to be in the size range of small gravel, and so the sediment mixtures for placement in the river are also screened to remove sand and silt. If the sediment is too small, it just flushes all the way down the river during floods and doesn’t remain to provide any benefits. If the sediment is too large, it stays close to the augmentation site and causes the riverbed to become coarser there. The need for small to large gravels for placement makes considering the size distribution between these end points important. Too many small gravels make the riverbed overly mobile and easy to scour, which endangers salmon eggs incubating in the bed. However, a grain-size distribution that is skewed towards larger particles makes the riverbed too stable, so that salmon are unable to move the sediment when attempting to construct a redd. These considerations make the size class of sediment another subject of adaptive management, and over time TRRP has reduced the size of sediment that is added to the river. Studies have also pointed toward ways that coarse sediments (gravel and cobble) interact with fine sediment (sand and silt), and restoring a natural balance of these grain sizes is an objective of the sediment augmentation program at the TRRP.  In the future you may hear of sediment with a more natural size distribution (e.g., “bank run material”) being used in sediment augmentation projects.

Filling deep pools

When you observe a river during typical baseflows, pools are calm while riffles are noisy, turbulent and swift. From an above water view, its natural to think that sediments would settle from these active riffles to its calmer neighboring pools. During low flow, if you look underwater, the river only has the power to move finer sediments, like sand and silt. Conversely, coarse sediment, such as gravel and cobble move only when the hydrology of the river is powerful with high flow or flooding.

When rivers flood, we see something that river scientists call a “flow reversal”. Flow reversal is when deep pools transition into a high-energy environment where flow velocity is more vigorous than on riffles. In this instance water meets the pool (and its surrounding environment, like bedrock) with force and activates sediments of different sizes within the pool. These sediments are “scoured” from the pool and placed on the riffle below it typically expanding a pool’s depth and also building the riffle below. Next time during a high flow, check out the way a pool churns and take note to notice the way water interacts with the riffle that lye underneath. During high discharges, flows on riffles are comparatively slow because the surface is not as deep. This interaction causes the water to “feel” the bed and slow due to its rough texture. These interactions cause sediment to deposit on riffles and scour from pools during high flows. The size of sediments that move are directly correlated to the amount of water flowing down the river and these events are the force behind building the riffles and pools of the Trinity River.

TRRP sediment augmentation projects have sometimes been thought to contribute to the filling of deep pools in the river and there have been cases where pool depths have decreased in areas that the TRRP has worked to restore the river. However, TRRP studies have shown that this tends to occur where stream power decreases in the channel from lowering the elevation of adjacent floodplains and vegetation, which causes the flow to spread out instead of concentrate in the channel. In many areas of the Trinity River, lowering floodplains is necessary to reconnect them with the river during floods for the benefit of the fish, wildlife and plants that live there. This conundrum is another subject of adaptive management, and TRRP often avoids actions that would have a strong likelihood of affecting pool depths so that holding habitat for over-summering fish such as spring-run Chinook salmon remains available.  

The next time you visit the Trinity River, take a close look at the sediments that you see. Depending on the time of year, you may see salmon redds constructed of gravels.  You will also most likely find aquatic invertebrates and biofilm living on the gravel and cobbles surfaces. Dig into a sand and silt deposit along the channel margins and you might find juvenile lamprey wriggling around in these materials. You will certainly see how sediment forms the shape of the river. And hopefully you’ll come away with a greater appreciation of sediments that are the building blocks of the Trinity River!

Water fern (Azolla filiculoides)

There are various native plant species that cover the surface of stagnant or slow-moving water. One of these species is called water fern (Azolla filiculoides). Not to be confused with algae, Azolla is an aquatic vascular plant with a very shallow root system that grows on the water surface rather than in the water column. True to its name, it is a type of fern. Typically, the plant is bright or dark green, making the water appear to be covered in “pond scum”, but this plant is anything but scum. As a stress reaction, Azolla can turn a deep red-amber color, appearing dead or dormant. Despite the discreet and unassuming nature of this unusual plant, it has some mind-blowing properties, including the ability to purify water and fix nitrogen.

So how does Azolla affect our ecology here along the Trinity River? By covering slower moving bodies of water like ponds and backwater areas, it helps regulate water temperatures and provides habitat for cover-loving species. By the same mechanism, it also decreases habitat for mosquitos. It also serves as a food source for a wide variety of wildlife, from western pond turtles to waterfowl. These properties, combined with the ability to fix nitrogen and remove pollutants from water, make this easily over-looked water fern an important constituent of riparian and aquatic habitats.

Algae are an important component of a natural river ecosystem.  They photosynthesize, converting light into sugar for usable biological energy that forms the foundation of most foodwebs.  Cold, oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) rivers such as the Trinity are generally not perceived as having a lot of algae.  Back in 2018 a bloom of algae in the ‘restoration reach’ of the Trinity (roughly Lewiston to Helena) raised concerns; the bloom brought greater visibility of algae than we had seen in the Trinity in recent memory. 

For TRRP scientists, those concerns translated to numerous questions.  But questions that should be overlaid on the large body of literature from countless scientific studies done elsewhere.  That literature shows (repeatedly) a number of fundamental patterns: 

• A broad diversity of algae is natural in cold rivers like the Trinity.
• Young salmonids feed on small invertebrates that come both from the terrestrial environment and from within the river where algae is a primary food source. 
• In the river, algae grow primarily on the river bottom (it is “benthic”) while algae suspended in the water column (“planktonic”) is prevented from becoming thick by the swift outflow of the water. 
• Algae can be scoured from the river bottom during large floods, forming a reset for the benthic environment (what ecologists call a ‘disturbance’). 

Studies by Dr. Mary Power (U.C. Berkeley) and her associates, primarily in the nearby Eel River, had gone further with the studies of disturbance.  They found that while floods scour algae, they also scour some of the larger benthic invertebrates, particularly caddis fly larvae.  Caddis fly larvae consume large amounts of algae and build cases around themselves from wood and sand to prevent fish from eating them. Their studies found that floods are necessary for controlling caddis fly populations so that algae may rebuild, that chironomid larvae (nonbiting midges) then become more abundant, and then young salmon have more food available.

Prior to 2018, TRRP scientists had their hands full with issues higher up the food chain and thus more directly related to salmon production; algae had not been specifically studied within the Trinity restoration reach from an ecological point-of-view.  Questions arose… Was the bloom inappropriate for the Trinity? How much algae ‘ought’ the Trinity have?  Are the types of algae in the Trinity appropriate for producing chironomid larvae and thus fish food?  How does the abundance of algae in the Trinity correspond to natural flows or scheduled dam releases? 

In 2020 I began monitoring algae with a simple method to address these questions while not detracting from the ongoing focus on salmon.  I have been regularly measuring an index of algal abundance based on their visibility in underwater photography.  I have also been sampling the algae in winter and summer to identify the types of algae present.  A report from the first year of sampling is available at https://www.trrp.net/library/document/?id=2549. A second, multi-year report should be completed in 2024.

The algae in our focal reach of the Trinity River can be roughly placed into 3 groups: cyanobacteria (once known as ‘blue-green algae’), filamentous algae, and diatoms. 

Diatoms

Diatoms are amazing single-celled algae…  They form cell walls of silica (glass) with intricate patterns that look almost like spirograph art under a microscope, and many are actively mobile!  Some also are capable of capturing nitrogen, making them a particularly valuable food source for invertebrates, which then become a food source for young salmon.  These diatoms tend to have an orange color, so when aging Cladophora looks orange in the river, it actually is becoming covered with nutritious diatoms.  Diatoms also live directly on rocks, where they can build up to form a slippery surface.  When this “scum” of diatoms is removed from a river rock and placed under a microscope, not only is the beauty of those glass cell walls revealed, but also bazillions (OK – not a scientific term) of Chironomid larvae… fish food! 

While I lack specific data on the effect on invertebrates (and thus fish food), the pattern corresponded well with the studies by Dr. Power as well as observations from an ongoing invertebrate study being done in the Trinity. Indications are that Trinity and Lewiston dams, which prevent floods in winter, are preventing the ecological disturbance that builds algae communities to feed chironomid larvae for an optimal food supply as young salmon hatch and emerge from gravels.  Traditional ROD flows that don’t flood the river until April leaves an overly mature algae community (and invertebrates) in place while salmon fry emerge, then scours away the algae (the base of the food chain) when young salmon populations are peaking.  A shift in flow management to provide those scouring flows in winter should set the stage for more natural algal growth as well as optimal food supplies for emerging young salmon. 

With winter fully here and the holidays behind us, the Implementation Branch is moving forward with some exciting restoration proposals.  In recent past the TRRP publicly scoped two proposed channel rehabilitation projects, the Upper Conner Creek Rehabilitation Project in Junction City and the Sawmill Gravel Processing Site Project in Lewiston. A draft environmental assessment (EA) will be released in the coming weeks, and then the Implementation Branch and those involved in the project will host a public meeting to discuss the proposed designs and restoration activities. Keep an eye on our calendar or our facebook page for notification of that meeting. We hope to see you there.

Proposed Upper Conner Creek rehabilitation project

The proposed Upper Conner Creek project designs were prepared by the Hoopa Valley Tribal Fisheries Department and McBain Associates.  Long term assessment of past restoration work nearby and adaptive management have led program partners to determine that the lowered surfaces of these early projects were not inundating (providing low floodplain habitat) frequently enough.  Improvements in floodplain connectivity to the mainstem, as well as course sediment additions and large wood features will open opportunities for the river to rework its form to provide long-term channel complexity and high-quality salmon habitat.  The recreational aspect of this area is appreciated by many and was an important feature to consider for this project. Through consultation with local residents and river users, project designers have worked to maintain the Junction City Campground’s river access for boating and swimming.  The proposed Upper Conner Creek Project first phase of restoration will begin in the spring of 2024.

Sediment and Wood Augmentation Environmental Assessment

Also working its way through the environmental compliance pathway is the TRRP’s Sediment and Wood Augmentation EA. The EA seeks to establish four new augmentation sites and allows for wood placement at the five existing sites in addition to sediment augmentation to address the sediment and wood deficiency upstream of Indian Creek.  The new augmentation sites are also located in the upper river near Lewiston and include Dark Gulch, Trinity House Gulch, Steel Bridge, and Vitzthum Gulch.  The wood component of the analysis is an exciting addition to the EA.  Wood is critical to a dynamic river system as its benefits include creating fish cover, adding hydraulic complexity, connecting the main river with important fish feeding grounds called floodplains, retaining sediment and aiding a variety of river species by creating more robust habitat. The EA wrapped up its public comment period on November 22 and the public draft is available on TRRP.net. 

Trinity River Watershed Restoration Programmatic Environmental Assessment

Since the foundational 1999 Trinity River Flow Evaluation Report, decades of scientific research have poured into improving outcomes for Salmonids, both from within the Trinity River Basin and from rivers researched across the world. The cumulation of data has made scientists within the Program increasingly aware that shifting how the Program uses restoration flow allocation has the potential to lead to stronger and more resilient juvenile salmonids.

Restoration releases continuing through late spring and into the summer keep water colder than optimal for juvenile salmon growth. With size of outmigrating salmon strongly tied to their survival in the ocean, the correlating smaller sized salmon has led scientists to question if a change in management actions would benefit juvenile salmon. Further, Program scientists have figured out that greater than 60% of young chinook salmon have already left the restoration reach by the time spring restoration releases start to interact with restored habitat created by the Program over the last 18 years. River restorationists believe that if floodplains and side channels can get wet when more juvenile salmon are in the upper river to use them, then they can take advantage of all the extra food that those habitats create and if the water meets a range of ideal temperatures for these cold-blooded creatures, they will grow faster.

A partial implementation of an initial proposal to shift a portion of the annual restoration flow allocation earlier in the year occurred in the winter/spring of Water Year 2023 (partial because only elevated baseflows were implemented. The synchronized pulse flow component was not implemented); in September 2023, Program scientists proposed the same action for Water Year 2024 to the Trinity Management Council indicating to the Council that the proposal was the best available science in improving results for salmonids. Unfortunately, the TMC requires near unanimous votes to approve actions and failed to approve that proposal, with six votes in favor and two opposed. However, all was not lost. A group including Trinity County brought in a retired USFWS biologist to review the proposal and findings from the Water Year 2023 and offered to work with program scientists to craft a proposal that was perceived to be less problematic for late winter/early spring river-based recreation and its associated economic benefits. Parties worked together busily behind the scenes, and the revised winter flow proposal will be presented to the TMC at a special meeting on Jan. 18. If approved, modestly increased winter base flows would begin in February.

Gravel Bar Mapping Surveys

As the mapping work proceeded, the male salmon moved from the redd to a deep area that had scoured around the constructed wood jam shown in the picture (below). The male used the deep water and its overhead wood as protective cover and did not return to guarding the nest until the team moved far enough away for the fish to return to guard duty.