Mushrooms of Trinity County

Exploring Seasonal and Habitat Patterns of Trinity County Fungi 

By: Kiana Abel, Trinity River Restoration Program. Article has been adapted from Kyle Sipes Science on Tap presentation, “Mushrooms of Trinity County: From the South Fork to the Scott Mountains January 28, 2026.

Trinity County, located in Northern California, provides a variety of habitats for wild mushrooms. Over 800 species of mushroom-forming fungi have been documented in Trinity County (iNaturalist). In January we welcomed Kyle Sipes, avid mushroom enthusiast, to present, “Mushrooms of Trinity County: From the South Fork to the Scott Mountains” at our Science on Tap event. If you missed his presentation and are interested in foraging for mushrooms, we hope to summarize the presentation here and share some of the tools for mushroom identification. Most notably, his presentation was structured around understanding preferred habitat, symbiotic relationships and key identifying features of individual mushroom types.  In this article we hope to give an outline of mushroom hunting through forest types indicating seasonality, habitat details and identification tips. We will explore the life history of mushrooms to enhance understanding of their role within forest ecosystems. 

sciencelearn.org.nz

Life History and Ecological Roles of Mushrooms 

Mushrooms are the fruiting bodies of fungi, and their life history begins with microscopic spores released into the environment. When conditions are favorable; adequate moisture, temperature, and a suitable substrate, these spores germinate into thread-like structures called hyphae. Hyphae grow and branch underground to form a network known as mycelium, which is considered the main body of the fungus, not the fruiting part that we see above ground.  

From there, fungi interact with their habitat either as a decomposer, in a symbiotic relationship, or as a pathogen or parasite to their host. While unique, each interaction reflects the adaptability of fungi and their importance in nutrient cycling, forest ecology, and plant health.

Gwinnett County Master Gardeners Association

Decomposers (Saprotrophic Fungi) Break down dead organic matter such as fallen leaves, wood, and plant debris, recycling nutrients back into the soil. 

Decomposer fungi play a critical role in forest ecosystems by breaking down dead organic matter such as fallen leaves, logs, and plant debris. This process recycles nutrients back into the soil, enriching it for future plant growth. In Trinity County, several mushrooms act as decomposers. Lion’s mane (Hericium erinaceus), for example, grows on dead or dying hardwood logs and is known for its cascading white spines. Turkey tail (Trametes versicolor), another common decomposer, forms colorful, fan-shaped brackets on decaying wood and is widely recognized for its medicinal properties. These fungi accelerate the decomposition of lignin and cellulose, substances that are otherwise slow to break down, making them essential for maintaining soil health and supporting the forest’s nutrient cycle. 

Symbiotic fungi (mycorrhizal) Form mutualistic partnerships with plant roots, exchanging water and minerals for sugars produced by photosynthesis; this relationship is critical for forest health. 

A symbiotic relationship between trees and mushrooms is a mutualistic partnership where both organisms benefit. Most edible and forest mushrooms form mycorrhizal associations with tree roots. In this relationship, the mushroom’s underground network of filaments (mycelium) attaches to the tree’s root system. The tree provides the fungus with carbohydrates produced through photosynthesis, while the fungus helps the tree absorb water and essential minerals like phosphorus and nitrogen from the soil. This exchange strengthens tree health, improves soil structure, and supports the growth of the mushroom. These partnerships are species-specific as certain mushrooms only pair with particular trees, such as chanterelles with Douglas fir or boletes with pine and fir. 

Pathogens or Parasites Infect living plants or trees and sometimes cause disease—these are often referred to as fungal pathogens. 

Unlike decomposers, pathogenic or parasitic fungi infect living plants or trees, often causing disease or structural damage. These fungi extract nutrients from their hosts, sometimes weakening or killing them. In Trinity County, an example is west coast reishi (Ganoderma oregonense), which causes white rot in living trees and can eventually lead to tree failure. While these fungi can be harmful to individual trees, they also play a role in forest dynamics by creating gaps in the canopy that allow new growth and biodiversity.

Common Mushrooms in Trinity County – By Forest Type

Finding mushrooms in Trinity County changes dramatically with the seasons. Knowing when and where to look is key for successful and safe foraging. Each season brings different species that thrive under specific forest conditions and tree associations. This guide outlines the most common mushrooms found in the county, their preferred habitats, and identification tips to help you distinguish between varieties.   

Riparian Hardwood Forests 

Photo curtesy of Kyle Sipes

The Riparian Hardwood Forests are primarily situated alongside rivers or streams with varying degrees of proximity to the water’s edge. These ecosystems connect aquatic and upland areas through dynamic water flow. Various plant species thrive in different hydrologic zones based on their dependence on water. In Trinity County the streams and rivers that comprise riparian areas are the Trinity River, North Fork Trinity River, South Fork Trinity River, not to mention smaller creeks like Coffee Creek, Canyon Creek or Hayfork Creek.  Hardwood tree species that are found in riparian river corridors are cottonwoods, like black and Fremont cottonwood, Oregon ash, white alder (the most common riparian tree) and tree willows like red and shiny willow. It is vitally important to understand and identify riparian trees when mushroom hunting.  

Yellow Morel (Morchella americanna)

Riparian morels (Morchella species) emerge after the first warm rains, typically March through May. A prized edible that grow with cottonwood, Oregon ash and apple trees here in Trinity County. They are known to populate disturbance areas affected by flood, fire or fallen trees.  

Identification Tips: 

  • Honeycomb-like cap with pits and ridges. 
  • Hollow stem and cap when sliced open – a key indicator of a true morel. 
  • Colors range from tan to dark brown. 

Other morels that occur with cottonwoods: Various black morels (M. norveginesus, M. brunnea, M. populiphila )

Thimble Cap (Verpa bohemica) 

A related species to the morel that may indicate you are slightly early in your search for true yellow morels. Like the yellow morel, the thimble cap occurs with cottonwood species and is as thought to be as delicious as the yellow morel yet restricting consumption of this mushroom is advised (iNaturalist)

Identification Tips: 

  • Wrinkled cap (versus honeycomb-like) with pits and ridges 
  • Pithy filled stem that goes all the way to the cap when sliced open  
  • Colors range from tan to dark brown. 

Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus spp.)

Oyster mushrooms, often seen in restaurant dishes, grow on riparian hardwoods like cottonwood, ash, willow, and alder. They are a safe choice for beginner foragers due to the lack of dangerous look-alikes. 

Identification Tips: 

  • Gills run all the way down its stem 
  • Grows on trees (versus in the ground) 
  • White, creamy or tan in color 

  

Honey Mushroom (Armillaria spp.) 

Honey mushrooms are a parasitic mushroom that infects their host as they feed from it. It is only edible if cooked significantly well, otherwise if undercooked it can make you sick.   

Identification Tips: 

  • It grows in big clusters at the base of the tree. 
  • Gills run slightly down the stem. 
  • Has a prominent skirt on the stem called an annulus 
Honey Mushroom (Armillaria spp.) 

Low Elevation Mixed Conifer-Hardwood Woodland 

Moving away from the rivers and into the low elevation mixed woodlands look for Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii), Tanoak with populations in western Trinity and Coffee Creek, madrone and Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). Most mushrooms in this area will populate in the early fall with first rains and prior to frost or snow.  

Cascade Chanterelle (Cantharellus cascadensis)

Chanterelles are a mycorrhizal associate with Douglas fir and true fir trees and if found make for a prized edible when found. Look for chanterelles in the fall after the first rains. The cascade chanterelle (Cantharellus cascadensis) does have poisonous look-alikes to watch out for, including the Jack O’ Lantern (Omphalatus olivescens) in Trinity County and others not yet found in Trinity such as the False Chanterelle (Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca).  

Identification Tips: 

  • Has ridges or false gills that run down the stem. 
  • Grows with Douglas fir out of the ground (not from the wood) 
  • When cut in half, the flesh is orange outside and white inside 
  • Should not be confused with the Jack-o-Lantern mushroom or False Chanterelle.

Jack O’ Lantern (Omphalatus olivescens) 

A showy beautiful mushroom that grows at the base of oak trees attached to the wood itself. The Jack O’ Lantern mushroom can make you very sick if ingested and can be confused with the cascade chanterelle.  

Identification Tips: 

  • True gills, bladelike structures. 
  • When cut in half, the flesh is orange all the way through. 
  • Grows from the wood of oak trees. 
  • Should not be confused with the cascade chanterelle. 

White Chanterelles (Cantharellus subalbidus) 

White chanterelles are symbiotic with Douglas fir and tanoak trees and like the orange chanterelle make for a prized edible when found. Look for white chanterelles in early fall after rains but prior to freezing.  

Identification Tips: 

  • Has ridges or false gills that run down the stem. 
  • White to cream colored 
  • Grows with Douglas fir & tanoak out of the ground (not from the wood) 
  • Gets soggy with rain as time progresses through the fall.

Queen Bolete (Boletus regineus) 

Royal boletes, including King and Queen varieties, are prized edibles from the porcini family. They thrive in early fall rains but do not persist through winter. Typically found near tanoak and true oak, these mushrooms form strong mycorrhizal bonds with roots, enhancing tree health and soil nutrient cycling.  

Identification Tips: 

  • Pores instead of gills 
  • Has a whitish bloom on the cap when young 
  • Stem shows a prominent netting (reticulation) 

Black Trumpets (Caterellus calicornucopoides) 

Black trumpets are more common in Western Trinity County than other areas due to the mushrooms relationship with tanoak. These saprotrophic mushrooms decompose dead organic matter, recycling nutrients into the soil and can also be found near black oak, and live oak. They grow in the winter months and can be recognized by their distinct color, shape, and smell.  

Identification Tips: 

  • Color is black, grey or sometimes dark brown 
  • Look like trumpets with wavy edges rolled outwards. 
  • Hollow from the base to the edge.   
  • Does not have gills or pores. 

Oak Woodlands

Trinity County Oak Woodland [Kyle Sipes]

Oak woodlands are another lower elevation forest of Trinity County made up of trees such as white oak, black oak and blue oak. In these types of forests, most mushrooms in Trinity County grow with black oak, so learning to identify this tree is important when foraging!  

Butter Boletes (Butyriboletus spp.) 

Butter boletes fruit under white and black oaks in the early fall after early season warm rains.  

  • Bright yellow stem & pores 
  • Spongy underside and a bulbous stem 
  • Bruise blue when nicked on the pore surface versus on the inside 

Oak Satan Bolete (Rubroboletus eastwoodiae)

Beautiful yet very toxic mushroom that will fruit under oaks at the same time as butter boletes. 

  • Red pores and cap 
  • Bruises blue on the inside when bisected 
  • Spongy underside and a bulbous stem 

High Elevation Conifer Forests 

High elevation conifer forests are characterized by dense stands of evergreen trees, primarily conifers such as white fir, Shasta red fir and sugar pine. These forests typically occur at elevations above 3000 feet and are often found on steep, exposed slopes.   

In the Trinity Alps, upland morels are the most commonly found edible mushroom. Some species of morels thrive in areas affected by wildfires. The nutrient-rich soil created by fires fosters morel growth, usually within one to two years after a burn but some species don’t appear until several years post-fire. Fires reduce competition and help spores germinate, forming helpful relationships with surviving trees. This makes recent burn sites ideal for spring foraging, resulting in plentiful morel harvests.

There are about 4 to 6 species of morels that adapt well to burn areas, and although they are hard to distinguish, different species appear in these fire-affected zones at various times. 

Black Morel (Morchella snyderi)

Besides the burn morels that occur 1-3 years after a burn,  Morchella snyderi will be a mushroom to keep your eye out for. M. snyderi occurs in high elevation areas 3-4 years after a burn in undisturbed true fir forests, more commonly found near Mt. Shasta, but can be found in the Marbles and Trinities. 

  • Look for morels a few weeks after the snow has receded.
  • Occurs in undisturbed true fir forests and several year old burns of the same forest type.
  • Occurs in the Trinities and very common around Mt. Shasta. 

Spring King Bolete (Boletus rex-veris) 

Also found in the high elevation conifer forests are the King Bolete. Look for these a few weeks after the fruiting of morels in true fir forests.

  • Pores instead of gills. Reticulation on stipe
  • Occurs with true firs approximately 2 weeks after the morel flush.
  • Often grows as shrumps.
  • Not as good as fall porcini but still an excellent edible

Photos provided by Kyle Sipes – unless otherwise noted on the image.

The January 28, Science on Tap event was recorded with the presenters permission. Once the video is edited to include the slides, we will post it here!

Kiana Abel, Public Affairs Specialist

As Public Affairs Specialist for the Trinity River Restoration Program, Kiana manages external communications, media relations, and stakeholder outreach. She acts as a liaison between program initiatives and the public, transforming technical findings into compelling narratives that promote understanding of restoration initiatives on the Trinity River. Kiana holds a Batchelor’s in Art History, has spent most of her career in marketing and is focused at the TRRP on bridging the gap between public awareness and resource restoration and management. 

Water Year 2026 (Oct. 15 – Apr. 15)

Water Year ’26 thus far has been a rain driven year for storage in Trinity Reservoir. Current storage is a product of early season rain plus elevated levels at beginning of the water year.

Trinity Reservoir September 29, 2025 [Kiana Abel, Trinity River Restoration Program]

In October, Trinity measured in at 70% full with 1.7 million acre feet. Seasonal storms pushed storage over 2 million acre feet (or 84%) in early January leading reservoir managers to implement reservoir management releases after a synchronized storm pulse flow was paired with a post-December 15 storm. By the end of January a lack of rain and snow returned releases to winter baseflow (300 cfs).

Trinity Reservoir Daily Data (CDEC) – click the link for daily data

  • Storage on [Feb. 13, 2026]: 2,050,645 AF
  • Capacity: 84%
  • Historic 15 Year Average (for this date): 131%
  • Average storage for [Feb. 12]: 1,601,065 AF

Feb. Forecast – California-Nevada River Forecast Center

February’s long range weather forecast is thus far looking a bit more wet than late January.

The volume of environmental flow releases for the Trinity River Restoration Program’s Wet-Season Baseflow Period (Feb. 15-Apr. 14) are determined by a conservative monthly inflow projection for Trinity Reservoir from the California Department of Water Resources (90% B120) in February, March with the final determination in April.

Prior to the official determination, which is published around the 10th of the month, water managers follow the California-Nevada River Forecast Center Median forecast for Trinity Lake inflow to stay abreast of the water year projections thus far.

The graph (shown in screen shot above) can be a little daunting to read, but when armed with the appropriate information is discernable for any viewer.

The Program’s Water-Year Volume Allocation as specified by the Record of Decision is outlined in the table below. The far left column is the threshold amount of state forecasted inflow in the Trinity Reservoir listed in acre feet which determines the center column, water year type. Then in the right column is listed the allocation to restoration for that water year, which includes baseflows.

Return now to an enlargement of the CNRFC forecast screenshot from Feb 13. Check out the light grey box “WY Vol Fcst 10/90%: 1,740/985 kaf” which reads longform as the following;

As of Feb. 11, the 10% of probability for Trinity Lake Inflow is predicted as 1,740,000 acre feet and the 90% of probability is 985,000 acre feet. Translated there is a 10% probability that the Trinity Allocation is predicted as “Wet” and a 90% probability as “Dry”.

As managers track the predicted inflow via CNRFC, the Program’s Flow Workgroup develops hydrograph scenarios to use when the final determination is published by the California Department of Water Resources. The two agencies use different methods when it comes to these prediction tools, the California Department of Water Resources uses data that has a weighted average to compute statewide Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and is known as a more conservative forecast method when comparing the two.

Wet-Season Baseflow Period (Feb. 15 – Apr. 14)

The next period within the Trinity River Restoration Program environmental flow management is the Wet-Season Baseflow Period, which initiates Feb. 15. The California Department of Water Resources February 90% B120 declaration was published on Feb. 9 as “dry” with the 90% determination at 735,000 acre feet.

With a Feb. B120 determination of “Dry” or “Critically Dry” the Feb 15-Mar. 15 period will not increase releases to the Trinity River and Lewiston Dam flows will remain at 300 cfs (winter baseflow) until Mar. 15.

Environmental Flow Implementation Decision Tree from the Trinity River Winter Flow Project (Abel etal. 2022)

Prior to the next period (Apr. 15 – variable), the Program has a check-in on Mar. 15 to adjust flows based on the March 90% B120 declaration. In April, the Program implements a spring snow-melt and recession hydrograph following the final B120 water year determination by the Department of Water Resources.

Program Update – Chinook & Coho Salmon Run-Size Estimates 2025

By: Kiana Abel (TRRP), Nick Van Vleet (CDFW) & Morgan Knechtle (CDFW)

Preliminary Results for 2025 Klamath Basin Natural-Origin Adult Escapement

Preliminary results from monitoring of natural-spawning fall-run Chinook salmon for the Klamath Basin (which includes the Trinity River Watershed) have estimated adult (age 3-5) returns slightly below the 40,700 target for maximum sustainable yield for 2025. These preliminary results place natural-spawner escapement well above pre-season expectations (<30,000).

The Trinity River accounted for much of this success, with natural-spawner estimates just shy of 24,500 above the Willow Creek Weir. About 14,000 adults are noted within that total. These results move the status of Klamath natural-spawning fall Chinook escapement from overfished to rebuilding status under the regulatory outlines set by NOAA Fisheries. The Klamath Basin has been in overfished status since 2018. The improvement in adult returns is likely due to several factors, including notably, the closure of both the in-river and commercial ocean fishery (with exception of a 2-day recreational ocean fishery last June) in 2025. Habitat enhancements for juvenile chinook and favorable hydrologic and temperature conditions during the rearing period are also likely contributing factors.

Coho Return Estimates Are a Different Story

With significant improvement to Chinook returns, coho returns told a different story. While Central California and Oregon coastal streams reported strong runs (some exceeding recovery targets) Trinity River coho returns remain low. Fish biologists surmise the discrepancy between regions could be due to challenges specific to the Trinity Basin during the rearing period for the 2025 escapement class. Challenges including severe drought, water temperatures during nesting phase, egg health issues like thiamine deficiency, and health of hatchery egg stock. Due to lack of pairs, hatchery operations will rear limited numbers of coho this winter, and no coho specific in-stream Remote Site Incubation projects are planned in the Trinity Watershed this winter.

Management of Klamath Basin Chinook Escapement and Harvest Quotas

A CDFW technician collects salmonid data during the trapping season at the Willow Creek weir.

The Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) adopts harvest plans for Klamath Basin Chinook under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, ensuring sustainable harvest and stock rebuilding. Each year, PFMC develops Fishery Management Plans and harvest specifications using pre-season forecasts provided by in-river monitoring, stock assessments, and harvest control rules tied to conservation objectives. The process incorporates broad stakeholder input, including tribal, commercial, and recreational representatives, through public hearings and advisory panels. Scientific review by NOAA Fisheries and state biologists evaluates population dynamics, ocean conditions, and climate trends to model impacts of proposed harvest levels. After public comment and review, PFMC adopts final quotas and season structures, which NOAA Fisheries implement federally, and states align for inland waters. This transparent, science-based framework balances sustainability, equity, and ecosystem health while meeting escapement targets for the Klamath Basin.

Trinity River salmonid escapement is monitored annually via three weir locations on the Trinity River at the Willow Creek Weir, Hoopa Harvest Weir and the Junction City Weir. Additionally, biologists from a collection of agencies annually track the population of spring Chinook salmon and summer steelhead via snorkel dives throughout the New River, Canyon Creek, and the North and South Forks of the Trinity River.

Annual adult monitoring efforts at the Junction City weir are implemented by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife with monitoring assistance from the Hoopa Valley and Yurok Tribes and are funded by the Bureau of Reclamation. The Willow Creek weir is operated by CDFW with assistance from the Yurok Tribe during the coho monitoring period. Trapping efforts typically range from late spring/early summer to mid-fall/early winter.

Kiana Abel, Public Affairs Specialist

As Public Affairs Specialist for the Trinity River Restoration Program, Kiana manages external communications, media relations, and stakeholder outreach. She acts as a liaison between program initiatives and the public, transforming technical findings into compelling narratives that promote understanding of restoration initiatives on the Trinity River. Kiana holds a Batchelor’s in Art History, has spent most of her career in marketing and is focused at the TRRP on bridging the gap between public awareness and resource restoration and management. 

Featured Article – Wolf Spiders

By: Kiana Abel, Public Affairs Specialist – Trinity River Restoration Program

Family: Lycosidae

Wolf spiders are an incredibly common spider worldwide with 2400 described species that range in many different habitats, vary in size and coloration, have incredible eyesight and hunt by ambushing, chasing, pouncing and or tackling its prey. In fact, wolf spiders are classified to the Lycosidae family of arachnids, so named after the Greek word (from Ancient Greek λύκος (lúkos)) for wolf due characteristic hunting tactics of the two species.

Thin Legged Wolf Spider [Howard Bruner, inaturalist – Lewiston]
Carolina Wolf Spider (Hogna carolinensis). [wikimedia commons]
image
McCook’s Split wolf spider (Schizocosa mccooki). [Joaquin Hale – Lewiston]

California is home to more than 120 species of wolf spiders, ranging from tiny ground dwellers in the genus Pardosa (thin legged wolf spider) to the quite large Hogna carolinensis (Carolina wolf spider). When discerning between genera of wolf spiders, they can be very difficult to identify in the field without holding each type in your hand [or by using this genius method]. Although the wolf spider’s bite is not dangerous to humans (akin to a bee sting) capturing one on camera or in your hand can be difficult because they are fast – and they are, well. Mostly big. Also hairy. And a spider.  

Commonly all wolf spiders share traits such as parental care, eight eyes, active hunting techniques and coloration that hides them within their habitat. Knowing these identifying factors, the wolf spider can be distinguished quite easily from other common California spiders such as the brown recluse look alike, Titiotus californicus, tarantulas or black widow.

Desert Tarantula(c) LJ Moore-McClelland via iNatrualist
Western Black Widow. [Joaquin Hale – Lewiston]

Within the Lycosidae family there are 56 described spiders in the genus Schizocosa. Schizocosa mccooki, commonly known as the McCook’s Split Wolf Spider and can be found in Trinity County. This spider is identified by its medium sized (about 1.5 inches) hairy body, active hunting style, eight eyes (two very large center eyes, four under and two upper eyes) and a distinctive “heart mark” on its abdomen.  Most individuals live one year, with mating typically occurring in late summer or fall.

McCook’s Split Wolf Spider (Schizocosa mccooki). Original posted in inaturalist by (c) William Mason

The rearing and mating process for wolf spiders is unique in the spider world. Common to female wolf spiders, S. mccooki carries her egg sac attached to their spinnerets at the end of their abdomen until their spiderlings hatch. Once hatched, the juveniles remain on their mother’s back until they are ready to disperse into the world.

Wolf Spider Mothers Carry their Eggs – YouTube

Common to male Schizocosa is a complex leg-drumming display used to attract females during mating season. A 2022 study, published in Biology Letters, indicates that males use specific vibratory signals to court their desired female, creating unique and more complex patterns for larger females – the study hypothesizes this may be due to choosing a female that has a large carrying capacity for juvenile spiders once hatched (Choi etal, 2022). The study also found that females picked males with complex coordination of differing signals that may indicate her suiters athleticism (Choi etal, 2022).

Wolf spider, Schizocosa stridulans male courtship – YouTube

Spiders typically have eyes that suit their hunting styles, and unlike web-building spiders, wolf spiders rely on keen eyesight to capture prey. As mentioned earlier, wolf spiders have eight eyes, with a large pair front and center. Their eyesight is enhanced by a interior reflective layer called the tapetum lucidum that helps to shine light back into the spider’s vision effectively enhancing low-light conditions that aide them in nocturnal predation.

Tapetum lucidum is an evolutionary feature found in both predators and prey such as cats, deer, cows, and some spider species. If you are ever interested in hunting wolf spiders, simply head out with a headlamp on a moonless night, shine your light into the grass and look for two reflective eyes shining back at you from the darks of your backyard.

Araneomorph spider of which wolf spiders are categorized. Anatomy from Spidentify

Wolf spiders possess forward-pointing chelicerae, an appendage that almost resembles a well groomed mustache yet operates to aid immobilizing prey while fangs deliver venom at it’s tip. In wolf spiders, the chelicerae are relatively large and well-muscled, giving them the strength to subdue struggling insects during active hunts. Viewed closely, the chelicerae appear dark and glossy, sometimes with fine hairs, and the fangs curve slightly inward at the tips. This arrangement is both efficient for piercing prey and distinguish them from other spider groups such as tarantulas, whose fangs move vertically rather than side-to-side.

In S. mccooki, the chelicerae are proportionally large relative to the spider’s body size and are typically dark brown to black with a polished sheen that contrasts against the lighter patterned cephalothorax. Strong internal muscles allow the fangs to strike with enough force to quickly immobilize prey such as beetles or crickets. Fine sensory hairs line the cheliceral margins, helping the spider detect movement and handle struggling prey. In males, the chelicerae can also serve a communicative role, sometimes being lifted or vibrated in coordination with leg-drumming during courtship.

A Riparian Predator & Prey

Riparian corridors are home to a wide range of species that link terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Among these, the wolf spider is a key ground-dwelling predator that helps regulate insect populations and provides prey for higher trophic levels.

Wolf spiders are widespread in open habitats such as grasslands, chaparral, and riparian habitats where cobble bars, woody debris, and leaf litter provide hunting grounds and cover. These microhabitats are important refuges not only for wolf spiders but for the many insects they consume. As wolf spiders actively stalk prey such as earwigs, beetles, ants, and crickets, consuming them helps moderate insect communities which indirectly supports plant health thus contributing to ecosystem stability. S. mccooki and other wolf spiders also contribute to cross-boundary energy flow by serving themselves as prey for birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.

Mccooks Split Wolf Spider carrying its eggsac. [Martin Galli, inatrualist]

Recognizing the ecological functions of wolf spiders highlights why observation is often a better response than eradication. These spiders are integral components of riparian and terrestrial ecosystems, regulating insect populations and serving as prey for higher trophic levels. Their hunting strategies, reproductive behaviors, and physiological adaptations illustrate the complexity of predator–prey interactions that sustain biodiversity. By taking time to identify and observe a spider before removing or killing it, we not only learn more about local species but also foster an understanding of the interconnected roles that maintain ecosystem stability. In this way, simple curiosity can translate into conservation-minded awareness.

References

  1. Schizocosa mccooki – Wikipedia
  2. Common synanthropic spiders in California – Essig Museum of Entomology
  3. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/spider/wolf-spiders-in-california-everything-you-need-to-know/
  4. Wolf Spiders | Missouri Department of Conservation
  5. Male spiders drum out mesmerizing syncopated beats to woo mates | Live Science
  6. Increased signal complexity is associated with increased mating success | Biology Letters
  7. Spider anatomy – Spidentify
  8. Schizocosa mccooki (A Wolf Spider) | Idaho Fish and Game Species Catalog

Kiana Abel, Public Affairs Specialist

As Public Affairs Specialist for the Trinity River Restoration Program, Kiana manages external communications, media relations, and stakeholder outreach. She acts as a liaison between program initiatives and the public, transforming technical findings into compelling narratives that promote understanding of restoration initiatives on the Trinity River. Kiana holds a Batchelor’s in Art History, has spent most of her career in marketing and is focused at the TRRP on bridging the gap between public awareness and resource restoration and management. 

Plant Spotlight – Poison Oak and Skunk Brush

Toxicodendron diversilobum and Rhus trilobata

image comparison
On the left is poison oak, and the right is skunk brush. Notice the distinct ‘stem’ on the central leaflet on the poison oak plant. Skunk brush leaflets do not have this feature. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Fisheries Department]

Editor’s note: The shrub with the common names which include skunk brush, basket bush, fragrant sumac, lemon sumac, and lemonade bush is known across North America as both Rhus trilobata and Rhus aromatica. The nomenclature in this document follows McBain and Trush (2005) and refers to the plant as Rhus trilobata.

Have you ever walked in the woods and tried to identify poison oak along the path? Some folks walk with extreme caution as soon as they step from pavement and defined trails, driven by fear of injurious rash caused by this plant. The most common way that I hear folks identify poison oak is through a common rhyme “leaves of three, let it be.” This is an easy phrase to remember, but there are some loopholes in this simple rhyme. There are several look-alike species that cause no harm, and are in fact quite tasty, and can be eaten. Let’s start with the commonly defined ID features used in the Jepson manual to distinguish the two genera.

Poison Oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum) has axillary flowers which appear between the leaf axles with a pedicel, or stem at the base which causes the flowers and fruit to be spaced apart; leaflets adaxially shiny or oily-looking on the top; fruit creamy white or papery looking.

Skunk brush (Rhus trilobata) (also called basket bush, lemon sumac, fragrant sumac, and lemonade bush) flowers appear on the ends of the branches, also called “terminal”; flowers are often nearly sessile or appear tightly packed; leaflets dull, not very shiny; fruit red and often sticky. There’s an interesting additional flower mannerism in skunk brush – the flowers often are only male or only female on individual plants, but sometimes bisexual flowers can also be found on plants, this term is called polygamodioecious. This is why a whole area will have no fruit, and then a patch of plants might be loaded full of fruit.

Speaking of its red fruit, skunk brush’s other common names, lemonade bush and lemon sumac, refer to the berries. They have a sour, lemony flavor to them. It is said that early pioneers steeped the berries in water, and then added sugar to make lemonade. The berries are also eaten directly and are considered an important food source by some Native American tribes. Many wild animals consume the berries of both poison oak and skunk brush, particularly birds and small mammals, although they are not a preferred food source. Their tendency to stick to the stems through the winter makes them good emergency food for animals when other foods are scarce.

Skunk Brush (Rhus trilobata) with fall berries. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Fisheries Department]

Expanding beyond the features that the Jepson uses for ID there can be a lot more subtlety of distinguishing observations between the two species. The more that you look at these two, the more you will learn to differentiate between them in your own way! Here are a few more features that I have noticed over the years.

Leaves

Remember “leaves of three, let them be”? Well the more accurate saying should be, “leaflets of three, let them be” because according to plant anatomists, the three “leaves” on a poison oak plant are actually a single leaf, divided into three leaflets. Poison oak appears to have a stem on the terminal leaflet which separates it from the basal lobes. The leaves often have 3-dimensionality to them, either with ruffled edges, or a central crease along the midrib of the leaf, with venation standing out as slightly white when viewed from above. Any leaf features on poison oak can be highly variable and thus expect it to surprise you at times. As field botanists often joke that poison oak will often take on the look of nearby plants.

Skunk brush tends to have the front leaflet be a little larger and the back appear slightly reduced in size. These leaves do not have a stem attaching the leaflets together. The leaves tend to be extraordinarily flat or could be described as “2D.” Often times the venation is only distinctly visible from the abaxial or underside of the leaf. Sometimes there is a little trench-like crease from the topside but the veins don’t stand out looking down on it.

The last feature that is helpful for differentiating these two species, is the color and mannerisms of the stems of each plant, even when dormant. Poison oak tends to have yellowish stems, often times with hibernating buds that look like little pink primordial hands. Poison oak is also known for making little adventitious roots on the branches which helps it climb trees and spread aggressively over the ground. It isn’t unusual to see poison oak growing as either a shrub or a vine (but it’s not the same as ‘poison ivy’, which is not found in California.  

The “yellowish” stems of poison oak. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Fisheries Department]

Skunk brush has branches that look ashy grey or pinkish purple and in early spring they tend to be layered in a tender fuzz that is reminiscent of the velvet covering a young deer’s antlers. Also, the smell of skunk brush is distinctly pleasant, both when cut and when burned. One might imagine these sticks being used for incense, or something similar.

The tender fuzz covered stems of skunk brush. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Tribal Fisheries]

Both species tend to come out of winter dormancy around the same time. However the first features to awaken in poison oak are its new shiny leaves, whereas the first feature to appear for skunk brush, are the flowers. Often times the timing of this awakening from dormancy is highly variable year to year and can track the warmth changing around the landscape in a very intimate way.

Comparison of the two species in early spring when poison oak shows leaves first and skunk brush’s flowers are first. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Fisheries Department]

Initially, botanists placed both poison oak and skunk brush in the same genus- Rhus. This name is Greek for ‘rhous’ which means flow, or stream. Some have thought that this might refer to the sticky sap that is excreted when cut, but others have rejected this claim. The reclassification of poison oak to its own genus “Toxicodendron” occurred in the early 20th century as the genus was given definition and separated out those representatives within Rhus that caused skin irritation. Toxicodendron means “poison – tree” in Greek which was also a contentious definition because technically the plant is not poisonous, but is an irritant, and in fact has many medicinal and beneficial properties. In Hupa language the word for poison oak is k’e:k’ilye:ch’. In Yurok the word for poison oak is me’yk’welep’. The Karuk word for poison oak is kusvêep.

image

Urushiol is the chemical present in the Toxicodendron genus that is renowned for irritating the skin. This oil is described as similar to machine oil in its difficulty to remove. Some recommendations suggest removing it using a sudsy soap and an abrasive scrubbing surface under cold water. Also, some home remedies recommend rubbing clay or dirt on fresh oils as it can absorb the oils and reduce the interactions with your skin cells. According to the National Library of Medicine, the reaction caused by urushiol is a Type IV Hypersensitivity reaction which is often stimulated in 48-72 hours after exposure and is a T-cell mediated immune reaction, suggesting that it is the between-cell interactions that cause the body’s immune response to the oils.

Urushiol is the chemical present in the Toxicodendron genus that is renowned for irritating the skin. This oil is described as similar to machine oil in its difficulty to remove. Some recommendations suggest removing it using a sudsy soap and an abrasive scrubbing surface under cold water. Also, some home remedies recommend rubbing clay or dirt on fresh oils as it can absorb the oils and reduce the interactions with your skin cells. According to the National Library of Medicine, the reaction caused by urushiol is a Type IV Hypersensitivity reaction which is often stimulated in 48-72 hours after exposure and is a T-cell mediated immune reaction, suggesting that it is the between-cell interactions that cause the body’s immune response to the oils.

As with many plants in the California landscape, both poison oak and skunk brush have a fire relationship. Although poison oak burning can aerosolize the urushiol, if the fire develops to just the right amount of heat and time of day, a completely safe fire can “stand up” and send the toxic smoke harmlessly into the upper atmosphere. Some indigenous descriptions report that the current prevalence of poison oak in forest understories is due to the lack of short fire return intervals on the landscape. Skunk brush was used by many tribes in California as a basketry stick. These stems were burned, just as hazel was for its shoots. In my personal experience burning with North Fork Mono led by cultural fire practitioner and Tribal Chairman, Ron Good, when the color of the ash turns purple, it can indicate that the fire and embers are the right intensity and is cool enough to cultivate the healthy regrowth of the plant. With burning and fire intensity, ash color and burned soil color as well as charcoal remains can all be an indicators of the temperature of the flames and their effects on the plant and soil communities. For more information dig into the resources at the FRAMES federally hosted fire effects resource page.

A common medicinal concept held by many of the tribes in our northern California region is that the medicine can be found near the cause of the problem. Poison oak is the classic example of this. Mugwort is a strong medicine for neutralizing poison oak, in particular salves made from it, but also a tea, taken internally can soothe the body’s reaction. Other common medicines include manzanita and madrone bark which a cooled tea of these can soothe the blisters and calm the body’s reaction. This idea can remind us that rather than thinking of the world as full of dangers and poisons that lie just beyond the edge of the path, rather that medicines and foods are always near to provide support and soothe the ails that arise along the way.

Resources:

  1. iNat: Photos Toxicodendron diversilobum
  2. iNat: Rhus Aromatica
  3. FRAMES Fire Effects resource page https://www.frames.gov/fire-effects
  4. Science History Institute Museum and Library: No Ill Nature: The Surprising History and Science of Poison Ivy and Its Relatives
  5. Jepson Key: Anacardiaceae Differentiating between Rhus and Toxicodendron
  6. An inaugural dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medicine … University of Pennsylvania, on the 22d day of May, 1798
  7. Henrietta’s Lit review of Rhus Toxicodendron (U. S. P.) in medicine
  8. National Library of Medicine: Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction

Simone Groves, Riparian Ecologist, Hoopa Valley Tribal Fisheries

Simone is first generation California transplant of Scottish descent raised in the unceded territories of the Raymatush in the rural west peninsula of the SF Bay where farmers, farm workers and hippies form the heart of the small town. She graduated in 2016 from Humboldt State University with a BS in Botany and has worked in the outskirts of rural Humboldt county on Natural Resource and Land management since 2013. She is passionate about plants and their interactions with dynamic systems as a mechanism for relearning our human-landscape interdependence.

Featured Article – C. shasta

A tiny parasite in the Klamath & Trinity Rivers

C. shasta a microscopic parasite. [captured as a screenshot from youtube, Shasta 2 Life Cycle Oregon State University]

What is C. shasta?

Ceratonova shasta (C. shasta) is a microscopic parasite that is native to rivers of the Pacific Northwest, including the Klamath and Trinity Rivers. Infection is most severe for juvenile salmon but can impact returning adults as well. The impact of an infection is highly influenced by water conditions like temperature, flow, and seasonality. If conditions are right for the parasite’s host worm, C. shasta can rapidly proliferate and lead to severe infections that can be devastating to populations. In 2021, after years of drought that impacted river conditions  juvenile salmonid deaths from C. shasta in the lower Klamath reached into the hundreds of thousands [1, 2]. 

To survive, C. shasta needs two hosts

1. A carpet of tiny worms
C. shasta starts its life inside a freshwater worm, called Manayunkia occidentalis. The worm, smaller than an eyelash, lives in mud and on rocks below the surface of a river or reservoir in colonies that can resemble an underwater carpet. Inside the worm, the parasite grows and turns into a new form called an actinospore. Once an actinospore, the worm releases the microscopic parasite to float in the water column and wait for its next host [3].

2. Salmon and Trout
As they swim young salmon breath in the actinospores allowing the parasite to attach to the gills and then enter the fish’s body. The parasite then travels to the fish’s intestines, where it multiplies and causes internal damage. This makes the fish sick and weak, causing many to succumb to the infection. The cycle continues when infected fish (including adults) release more spores back into the water after they die.

Jerri Bartholomew Ph.D. explains the complex lifecycle of C. shasta and her discovery of the second host involved in the disease. She presents some of the questions being explored in a collaborative effort to help salmon survive in the Klamath River.

Are Adult Salmon Affected?

Adult salmon can be infected with C. shasta however the severity is influenced by other stressors.  Typically, adults encounter the microscopic spores during upriver migration through areas with high spore loads (like the lower Klamath River during spring/summer). If the fish is stressed from high water temperatures, poor conditions or other pathogens, C. shasta could lead to pre-spawn mortality or failure to spawn. Although typically resistant, if infected, adults can act as a carrier of the parasite – shedding spores when they die and decompose. If the spores are shed in a system that does not have adequate flushing flows during the ensuing winter months, juveniles from the area could be affected. While some disease impacts to adult salmon are possible, if conditions in the river are favorable, adults are generally more resistant to effects of the disease than juveniles.

The Klamath River

Salmon health and vitality is of utmost importance for Klamath indigenous groups like the Yurok, Quartz Valley, Karuk, and Hoopa Valley Tribes. For millennia salmon have provided sustenance and are celebrated as integral to the health of people, culture, tradition, and economy. The continued decline of salmon due to C. shasta and other human-enhanced factors are deeply felt by local people and led to the decade’s long advocacy to remove four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River.

In 2023 and 2024 these dams on the Klamath River were removed, allowing salmon, steelhead and lamprey to reconnect to 400 miles of spawning habitat. It is the largest dam removal project in U.S. history, to date. Ecological goals for dam removal are to improve water quality, restore resources to Klamath River Tribes, restore habitat for salmonid species, and improve the health of salmon and steelhead [5].

The Klamath River is home to several salmon species that are important to Native American tribes, commercial and recreational fishers, and the ecosystem as a whole. Although infections occur in all species of juvenile salmon or trout, if the parasitic worm host is allowed to thrive, results can be devastating for some salmon species. One such species of concern are Coho salmon, which are recognized as “threatened” in the Klamath and the Trinity and are especially vulnerable to population scale impacts from large scale fish kills propagated by parasites.

Toxic algal blooms were a problem in the stagnant waters sitting behind the dams on the Klamath River since the dams were built. Photo by Stormy Staats/Klamath Salmon Media Collaborative via KRRC.

What made the lower Klamath River a hotspot for C. shasta? Below Iron Gate dam, the primary reasons were twofold. First, scouring events from winter storms were blocked by dams failing to disperse sediment. Second, waters held in several chains of reservoirs warmed. Ultimately these combining factors led to robust habitat conditions for the parasite’s aquatic worm host. Fish heath experts in the Klamath Basin are hopeful that dam removal will mitigate previously favorable growing conditions for the host worm [6]. Removal of JC Boyle, Copco 1 & 2 and Iron Gate dams will allow for a more natural flow of water from tributaries and potentially help to scour growth of the host worm with winter storms.

Hope for Trinity River Fish Populations

The Trinity River joins the Klamath River approximately 44 miles above the ocean, so its fish are subjected to the conditions of the lower Klamath River during their migrations. Beginning in late winter juvenile chinook begin to migrate downriver feeding on drift invertebrates, resting and digesting in warmer slower waters. Once they meet the mild saline waters of the Klamath estuary, they begin a smoltification process where their bodies change and adapt from freshwater to saltwater. Cold temperatures and salinity may reduce progress of disease, but do not eliminate infection [1]. 

Because of their migration paths, Trinity River fish populations were part of the juvenile fish kill on the Klamath River in 2021. This event, along with historic drought conditions that followed, allowed for pathogens like C. shasta to play a significant role in returning adult escapement. Since most Chinook exhibit a 3-5 year life cycle, we’re still experiencing the loss of these juvenile fish today. Historically low returns of adult chinook salmon have prompted recreational fishery managers to close in-river salmon fishing seasons for a third consecutive year [8, 9]. Although the immediate impacts have been devastating for recreational anglers and river enthusiasts, there are many hopes (and also many unknowns still to be learned) following the removal of the dams. The primary hope for Trinity River outmigrant fish to experience less frequent and less severe infections once they reach the Klamath River so that juveniles as well as adults can manage natural stressors and thrive.

Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team

The Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team (KFHAT) is a technical workgroup which formed during the summer of 2003 with the purpose of providing early warning and a coordinated response effort to avoid, or at least address, non-hazardous materials related fish kill events in the anadromous portion of the Klamath River basin [10].

To accomplish this goal, KFHAT created a network of experts and monitoring efforts through which information about current river and fish health conditions in the Klamath Basin can be shared among participants, the general public, and resource managers.

Every year, beginning in late April, members of KFHAT hold meetings to assess Klamath Basin fish health along the Klamath and Trinity Rivers and their main tributaries. The group publishes observations as well as a readiness level map based on those observations on a public facing website: Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team (KFHAT) after each meeting.

How are juvenile populations fairing this out-migration season? The wet winter of 2024/2025 has set the system up with favorable fish health conditions, but our area’s typical hot July weather can lead to stressful lower river environments. Thus far the 2025 monitoring season has seen some irregularities with regards to concentration of C. shasta. Klamath Basin water quality monitoring is implemented annually by a team at Oregon State University and recent monitoring results are showing higher than normal spore counts of C. shasta in geographic areas that are puzzling scientists [10]. In the lower river, screw traps are catching Trinity River hatchery-released yearlings from the fall and spring brood stocks with infections [10]. Although these conditions exist each year, they vary in severity and salmon evolved to this specific weather pattern. The species stay healthy by seeking cold water refugia located in deep stratified pools and cold-water tributary mouths during the hottest weeks of the year.  Also typical to the area, wildfire can aid conditions when smoke sits in drainages, reflecting the sun’s heat back into the atmosphere and therefore cools air and water temperatures.

Updated after set meetings, the KFHAT map presents readiness levels for the Klamath Basin in a visual format. [Screenshot taken July 18, 2025 from the Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team website]

Although this year’s conditions thus far are concerning (note the yellow readiness levels in the map above), many juvenile salmon are in the last stages of migration to the ocean and are likely in the lower Klamath river undergoing smoltification or learning to live in their new ocean environment. What will conditions be when they return to spawn in our river in 2028, 2029, or 2030? Of course, only time can tell, but with the removal of four Klamath Dams, river managers are hopeful that, when it comes to controlled conditions, Trinity and Klamath run salmonids will have a more favorable environment than what populations have encountered for over six decades, and they might be more favorably armed to withstand what mother nature may bring their way.

Thank you to Dan Troxel, California Department of Fish and Wildlife lead on the Klamath Basin Fish Health Assessment Team and Morgan Knechtle from California Department of Fish and Wildlife for providing detailed edits to this article.

References

  1. As massive fish kill continues on Klamath River, Karuk Tribe declares state of climate emergency
  2. Serious fish kill consumes the Klamath River | Local News | heraldandnews.com
  3. Ceratonova shasta – Wikipedia
  4. Benefits of Klamath River Renewal – Klamath River Renewal
  5. TRRP: Fish of the Trinity River
  6. Dam removals, restoration project on Klamath River expected to help salmon, researchers conclude | Newsroom | Oregon State University
  7. Chinook Salmon Fact Sheet – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  8. Another Commercial Salmon Season Closure is Expected | News Blog North Coast Journal. April 22, 2025.
  9. CDFW News | Limited Chinook Sport Fishing to Reopen in 3 Central Valley Rivers, excludes Klamath Basin and Mainstem Sacramento.
  10. KFHAT_2025_Report_5.pdf

Further Reading

  1. TRRP: Fish of the Trinity River
  2. Trinity River Guage Temperature Readings – at Hoopa, Ca. USGS

Key Parasites of Salmonids in the Klamath and Trinity Rivers

ParasiteTypeKey Life Stage AffectedImpact SeverityNotes
Ceratonova shastaMyxozoanJuvenilesHighMajor mortality factor in Klamath
Parvicapsula minibicornisMyxozoanJuvenilesModerateCommon co-infection
Nanophyetus salmincolaTrematodeJuveniles & adultsModerateCommon in Trinity River fish
Ichthyophthirius (“Ich”)ProtozoanAll stagesVariableOutbreaks under warm conditions
Myxobolus spp.MyxozoanJuvenilesLow–moderateRare, possible underdiagnosis
Henneguya spp.MyxozoanJuveniles & adultsLowOccasional gill infections
Gyrodactylus, DactylogyrusMonogeneanJuvenilesLow–moderateMostly hatchery-associated
Sea liceCopepodSmolts in estuaryModerateNot a primary river concern upstream
Key Parasites of Salmonids in the Klamath and Trinity Rivers

Kiana Abel, Public Affairs Specialist

As Public Affairs Specialist for the Trinity River Restoration Program, Kiana manages external communications, media relations, and stakeholder outreach. She acts as a liaison between program initiatives and the public, transforming technical findings into compelling narratives that promote understanding of restoration initiatives on the Trinity River. Kiana holds a Batchelor’s in Art History, has spent most of her career in marketing and is focused at the TRRP on bridging the gap between public awareness and resource restoration and management. 

Plant Spotlight – Grasses of the Trinity River Watershed

Oak woodlands near Weaverville in 2020. [Kiana Abel, Trinity River Restoration Program]

As the weather starts to warm, California’s hillsides turn golden as grasses dry and take on a reflective sheen. Not only does California’s nickname “the Golden State” refer to it’s historic connection to the gold rush, it also refers to the rolling golden hills of native flowers, like the California golden poppy and less distinct but no less important the native grasses of California. California’s grasslands are a subtle and complex community of individuals which each invite the passerby to slow down and look carefully. One can also trace the last vestiges of water and see where the moisture lingers on the landscape. These last little patches of green show photosynthetic organisms reluctant to take shelter from the summer heat.

Historically it was farmers who were in touch with the detailed eye and mind tuned to the life cycle of grasses. To be a farmer who makes hay, is to understand the boom-and-bust lifecycle of being a grass. As many ranchers will say – being a rancher is really learning to be a grass-farmer. It is an intimate relationship to learn the rhythm of grass growing, to slow down and tap into the cycle. There is a critical threshold in the season, where all the grasses race at a break-neck pace to produce seed. As part of a grass’s strategy, it tracks day-by-day weather in a race to produce and distribute seed in the heat of summer. As a hay producer, it’s best to harvest your hay before all the energy has gone up into the seed and hardened off. This will allow some of the sugars to be readily available for consumption when an animal goes to eat it. If the grass is too far along towards producing its seed, the sugars in the grass become all locked up and stored into their long term, harder to digest form.

image
Diagram of grasses. [Photo credit: PlantNet Diagram: SWL Jacobs Taxon Concept]

If you’ve ever been curious about grasses, Trinity County has some beautiful remnant examples of grasslands clinging on to the edges of areas where mining did not bury their seeds beneath the sorted rocks. When identifying grasses, I find that it can be easiest to start with the things that you’ll see a lot of and try to find “friends” in the population. Each person relates to plants differently, but I find that it can help to try to find a few native grasses and a few non-native grasses to learn to train your eye to their differences. Knowing a handful of native and a handful of non-native grasses is a great place to start.

Comparing grass cousins

Bromus diandrus or rip gut brome. [Steven Thorsted via CalPhotos]
California Brome Bromus carinatus. [iNatrualist]
image

Here is Bromus diandrus or “rip gut brome” [iNaturalist John Lynden] so named for its ability to get the long awns of the plant (the bristle or hairy growth that helps carry a seed) all tangled and poking into the skin, mouth or gut of herbivores munching in grasslands. Rip gut brome was introduced to California from European Mediterranean areas and is considered invasive and harmful to crops and foragers alike.

Because grasses are difficult to discern, I’ve noted to visit and reexamine them as the season progresses. With each stage of development from flower to seed each species can change significantly showing their true colors. As Bromus diandrus develops it changes colors and can look quite purple.

image

Here’s a common native grass that looks quite similar to Bromus diandrus. A cousin to B. diandrus, this is Bromus carinatus or California brome [Rob Irwin via iNaturalist] which is a native bunch grass that can be found in many types of habitat.

California brome pollinates via wind, is a great asset in erosion control and is well adapted to survive under a regime of frequent fire. It is also an important food for bear, elk, black tailed deer and seed eating bird species of California.

Look closely when comparing these two brome species by looking at the hair-like awns sticking out of the flower.

In this photo B. carinatus is on the Left and B. diandrus is on the right. [Simone Groves, Hoopa Valley Tribal Fisheries Department]

Non-Native Grasses

As livestock were introduced to California, farmers often seeded grasses as forage so their animals would be well-fed where they landed. The easy and short list of these species is a great starting place to begin to recognize grasses. These species include orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), rye grass (lolium perenne), wild oats (Avena sp). Avena or wild oats are the same oats that we eat for oatmeal or give to our horses for grain.

Orchard Grass (Dactylis glomerata). [iNatrualist]
Rye grass (lolium perenne) [iNaturalist]
Wild Oats (Avena sp). [iNaturalist]

Native Grasses

And now for some of the native species of grasses! There are three classics to get to know in our area which are blue wild rye (Elymus glaucus), California oatgrass (Danthonia californica) and purple needle grass.

image

Blue wild rye (Elymus glaucus)

This grass is a tall hearty looking grass with a large seed. It’s very hard to photograph the whole seed head because it is so long and tall, but once you get to know this plant it’s quite distinct. Blue wildrye provides excellent habitat for birds, mammals and waterfowl, can be used to stabilize streambanks, and is very tolerant to fire. Early in the season it provides forage and the seed is an excellent summertime food source for native mammals and birds [USDA Blue Wildrye (Elymus glaucus) Plant Guide].

California Oatgrass (Danthonia californica)

Danthonia as the genus that represents a variety of native oats, and when you tune your eye you’ll notice slight variation within the group along with some similarities. Their inflorescence (arrangement of the flowers on a plant) is composed of 3-5 spikelets and it is a pretty distinct recipe once you start to recognize it. They have relatively short peduncles (stalks that hold the flower or seed), only about 1-2 feet above the ground and their most distinctive feature are their “hairy arm pits.” Danthonia tends to have very hairy leaves and sometimes particularly long hairs right where the leaf separates from the stalk. Danthonia also looks to me like a little field of tiny stars, as they stand in such a distinct pattern along the ground.

California Oatgrass (Danthonia californica). [iNaturalist]

Purple Needlegrass (Stipa pulchra) (Nassella pulchra)

Purple needlegrass. [edwardrooks via iNatrualist]

Lastly, Stipa pulchra, recently renamed to Nassella pulchra and commonly known as purple needlegrass is a grass that I – personally as a plant person – have heard a lot about throughout the state. Purple needle grass is the most widespread native grass in California and was named the “state grass” in 2004. In my experience I’ve have never seen it doing quite as well as the populations you can find here in Trinity County. This plant has long awns similar to rip gut brome but is soft to the touch while brome is typically quite coarse and harsh.

Purple needlegrass is drought tolerant and produces a lot of seed which helps to suppress non-native grass species.  This grass supports native oak habitats and provides nursery habitat for caterpillars and butterflies of California.

Getting to know grasses is a process of revisiting them frequently to see the way that they change through the year. Touching and observing their basal leaves versus their flowering stalks can help you get to know the ways that they are similar and different from each other. To me, the jovial angle that each grass holds its seed is an expression of its personality and projects attitude. As the seeds mature, usually the stems of the grass start to grow heavy, and once the seeds are dispersed, they’ll spring back up again.

Grasses are a huge part of the plants that we see in our daily lives. Their role creating tiny holes for insects to live in and deep roots which hold our soils together are foundational to a healthy landscape. It’s easy to overlook the niche of grasses when we all spend much of our time trying to weed whack them down. I encourage you to try to take that extra moment to see if you can identify if a grass is native or non-native, bunchgrass or annual grass. These little details are small pieces of history that we used to know in times long past.

References

Simone Groves, Riparian Ecologist, Hoopa Valley Tribal Fisheries

Simone is first generation California transplant of Scottish descent raised in the unceded territories of the Raymatush in the rural west peninsula of the SF Bay where farmers, farm workers and hippies form the heart of the small town. She graduated in 2016 from Humboldt State University with a BS in Botany and has worked in the outskirts of rural Humboldt county on Natural Resource and Land management since 2013. She is passionate about plants and their interactions with dynamic systems as a mechanism for relearning our human-landscape interdependence.

Bats of the Trinity River

By: Michael Dixon, Executive Director – Trinity River Restoration Program

Wait, bats? Of the river? Yes! A river is more than its bed and banks, it is also intricately tied to the valleys, canyons, and forests through which it flows. Many North American bats are tightly associated with proximity to both forest cover and water (e.g. Dixon 2012), and the bats of the Trinity River watershed follow suit. In fact, some of our bats do almost all of their foraging over and near water, which in a dry, mountainous landscape like ours, means over the Trinity River and its tributaries.

Bats fly into a Texas sunset. [US Fish and Wildlife Service]

Bats are the second largest order of mammals in the world, with >1,400 species on every continent except Antarctica, though a majority of those species are in the hyper-diverse tropics. The Klamath Mountains, through which the Trinity River flows, are home to at least 18 species (Reiss, Kauffman, and Feldman 2022). Some of these are year-round residents and are known to hibernate locally, whereas others migrate to warmer climates during the winter. All of our local bat species echolocate, meaning they essentially “yell” in very high frequency sound and then listen for the echoes (the same concept as sonar), which helps them navigate and feed in a dark world.

While the incredible worldwide diversity of bats includes many unique feeding styles such as nectar-feeding flower pollinators, fruit eaters, and (a bat fan favorite) bats that fish for food like the super cool fish-eating myotis, all of the bats in the Trinity watershed eat invertebrates like insects and spiders. That said, there’s a remarkable range of ways that they do that. Let’s take a look at a few of the species that call the Trinity River watershed home.

Myotis species

A little brown bat. [USFWS/Ann Froschauer]

Of the bats discussed here, the five or more small, brown, round-eared species of Myotis in our area are perhaps the closest to what people think of when they think of a “bat”. Their appearance exemplifies the German word for bat, Fledermaus or “flutter mouse”, though bats are much more closely related to deer, whales, and carnivores than to rodents.

Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis) are among the most frequently encountered species in the region and are “aerial insectivores”, meaning they forage on flying insects. They can be found flying along forest edges but most commonly over slow-moving water, typically only a couple feet above the river. This is because while they will also take things like moths and beetles, they are strongly predisposed to hunting emerging aquatic insects like caddisflies and midges. They make low, repeated passes over water smooth enough for their echolocation to detect the disturbance of insects on the waters’ surface. In areas where few large trees are found, they will form maternity roosts in buildings; these are where large groups of females gather together to raise their pups until they are old enough to disperse. However, in areas of the West including parts of the Trinity River where there are healthy riparian areas with large, old trees, they will roost in things like hollowed-out old cottonwood trees. This is one of the reasons that the Trinity River Restoration Program attempts to avoid impacts to mature riparian forests when building our restoration projects.

Another Myotis worthy of note is the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). While they are less abundant than Yuma myotis in the Trinity River region (Pierson and Rainey 2007), they are strongly predisposed to roosting in buildings and thus relatively commonly encountered. They are noteworthy in that, while fairly generalist in their feeding habits, they eat disproportionately large numbers of mosquitoes, making them allies of their human neighbors (Wray et al 2018). They have quite a large range, extending from the subarctic to the southern US, and through the late 2000s were among the most common bats on in North America. However, they are now classified as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature because of the catastrophic impacts of an introduced disease called white-nose syndrome; it is estimated that the eastern and midwestern populations of the species have declined by 90% since 2010.

Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) in a historic building. [Mike Dixon, Bureau of Reclamation]

Pallid bat

A pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus). Photo originally posted on ANAMALIA by Michael Durham/Minden Pictures, BCI

In contrast to the myotis bats described, pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus) are quite large, with a wingspan of up to 16 inches. Beyond their large size, they also have enormous ears that can be a third of their body length. This is because rather than catching insects on the wing, they are gleaners, meaning they hunt prey on structures or, in their case, the ground. They are still capable of echolocation, but their over-large ears also allow them to listen for the sounds of their prey and target them that way. They are particularly fond of scorpions, of all things. Their inconsistent use of echolocation and ground-hunting behavior also means they tend to hunt in more arid or open areas, but they still stay relatively close to water. They frequently roost in trees in northern California (Baker et al. 2008) but can also be loyal users of strategically located buildings as night roosts. Night roosts are places that bats hang out for a variety of reasons including rest, digestion, picking apart large prey items, and various social interactions including information sharing (Ormsby et al. 2007). For several years, I have observed congregations of 5-20 pallid bats in the same corner under my eaves almost every night when overnight lows temperatures exceed 45oF. I appreciate them keeping the front of my house scorpion-free!

One fun fact about the pallid bat is that it is officially the state bat of California!

Pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus) have frequently used this night roost on a cabin next to the East Branch of East Weaver Creek. [Mike Dixon, Bureau of Reclamation]

Hoary bat

Hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus) are striking in appearance. Rather than the shades of brown with which bats are often portrayed, the hoary bat has dark fir with brightly frosted tips and a yellowish face. Also unlike many bats of the temperature regions, it doesn’t hibernate – rather, it spends its summers from the northern U.S. (including northern California) well into Canada, and then in the fall migrates sometimes over 2,000 km south to a winter range that extends from the Southwest into Central America (Cryan et al 2004).

A hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus) roosting on the branch of a tree. [Paul Cryan USGS]

Rather than flying low over the water or ground or on the edges of forest, the hoary bat is a high-flying moth specialist that makes long passes over open water or the top of the forest canopy, sometimes flying almost 25 miles in a night of hunting. The coevolution of bats and moths has been a subject of long study, as there is evidence that echolocation by moth-hunting bats drove the evolution of ears and evasive behaviors in moths, which in turn changed how moth-specialist bats echolocate (Ter Hofstede and Ratcliffe 2016).

Hoary bats are more solitary than most of our bats and tend to roost individually by hanging from tree branches like dead leaves, but they can form large aggregations around landmarks during their long southward migrations. This means that after they leave our Klamath Mountains, they are often recorded in what would seem to be pretty unusual places for a bat – they have been observed swarming ships at sea and commonly recorded over the Farallon Islands 30 miles off the coast of San Francisco.  These long, sometimes over-water migrations also presumably led to one of the more unlikely events in the history of bats – the colonization of the Hawaiian Islands over 1.3 million years ago by hoary bats from what is now the west coast of the U.S. In this single founder event, wayward bats established the most isolated bat population in the world, which has since diverged significantly into its own species, the critically endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus semotus).

Bats and people

I have already mentioned how a couple of our native bats benefit people by controlling pests, and that topic has been the subject of many publications. Suffice it to say, bats are very important to the ecology of the Trinity River watershed and provide services to its people here and throughout the world, but they can also be inconvenient and, occasionally, dangerous to people. Here are a few suggestions for living with bats.

  • First and foremost – while bats don’t “carry” rabies (it is also deadly to them), the abnormal behavior of rabid bats is what often brings them into contact with people. NEVER pick up a bat that you encounter. It is unlikely that it has rabies, but the consequences of contracting rabies are so serious that it is not worth the risk. If you encounter a bat in your house, shoo it out but do not handle if it all avoidable – you’d be surprised how thick of a glove a bat can bite through!
  • If you have the space for it, embrace an untidy yard. Long grass provides a home for large insects like crickets that are preyed upon by our gleaning bats. Leaving fall leaves until the following spring allows many types of caterpillars and beetle grubs to use them as winter cover, providing food for our aerial insectivores the following summer. Trees with loose bark cavities or large are used by many species for roosting and can be left as habitat where they do not cause a hazard.
  • Many species like to use buildings for day or night roosts or for hibernation. Sometimes this isn’t a huge deal – I already mentioned that I appreciate the night roost above a seldom-used door at my house, and even use their guano as a garden amendment. However, in confined spaces like the walls and attics of buildings, the guano can become smelly and damage walls, and bats roosting in those places sometimes find their way into parts of those buildings with people (not a good thing, as already discussed). Many pest control companies have experience with excluding bats in a humane way (essentially letting them fly out but not back in). If you need bats evicted from your home, try to wait until late summer when the pups have fledged, so as not to separate foraging mothers from their flightless pups.  
  • If you’d like to encourage bats to use your property, you can build or buy prefabricated bat houses. The trick in a climate like that of the Trinity watershed with sometimes intensely hot days and cool nights is to find the right sun exposure. Nursing mothers and pups want a spot that will gather and retain heat into the evening but will not get so hot during the day as to be uninhabitable. There’s an element of trial and error (and luck) to getting bats to move in, but it’s a great way to provide wildlife habitat and help keep your bugs down. For more resources on gardening and bat houses, this is a great place to start: Bat Gardens & Houses – Bat Conservation International.

References

Baker, Michael D., Michael J. Lacki, Greg A. Falxa, P. Lee Droppelman, Ryan A. Slack, and Scott A. Slankard “Habitat Use of Pallid Bats in Coniferous Forests of Northern California,” Northwest Science 82(4), 269-275, (1 September 2008). 

Dixon, Michael D. “Relationship between land cover and insectivorous bat activity in an urban landscape.” Urban Ecosystems 15 (2012): 683-695.

Ormsbee, Patricia C., James D. Kiser, and Stuart I. Perlmeter. 2007. Importance of night roosts to the ecology of bats in Michael J. Lacki, John P. Hayes, and Allen Kurta, eds. Bats in Forests – Conservation and Management. The John Hopkins University Press: pp 129-151.

Pierson, Elizabeth D. and William E. Rainey. 2007. Bat distribution in the forested region of Northwestern California. Report for California Department of Fish & Game, Contract #FG-5123-WM.

Reiss, Karen, Michael Kauffman, and Chris Feldman. Mammals in Michael Kauffman and Justin Garwood, eds. (2022). The Klamath Mountains – A Natural History. Backcountry Press. Pp. 428-430.

Ter Hofstede, Hannah M., and John M. Ratcliffe. “Evolutionary escalation: the bat–moth arms race.” Journal of Experimental Biology 219.11 (2016): 1589-1602.

Wray, Amy K.; Michelle A. Jusino, Mark T. Banik, Jonathan M. Palmer, Heather Kaarakka, Paul White, Daniel L. Lindner, Claudio Gratton, and M. Zachariah Peery, (2018). “Incidence and taxonomic richness of mosquitoes in the diets of little brown and big brown bats”Journal of Mammalogy99 (3): 668–674.

Mike Dixon is the Executive Director of the Trinity River Restoration Program and a northern California native. He fell in love with the Trinity River and Klamath Mountains while assigned to his first duty station at Coast Guard Air Station Humboldt Bay. He received a Ph.D. in Conservation Biology from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, where his dissertation focused on the landscape ecology and population genetics of bats. He lives on a small, perennial tributary of the Trinity River near Weaverville.

Photo: The [much younger] author with a little brown bat in Voyageurs National Park

Animal Spotlight – Northwestern Pond Turtle

image

The northwestern pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) has lived in the waters of the Trinity River for thousands of years. This species has undergone several taxonomic revisions since first being first described in 1841 (1, 2, 3).  It was originally considered a single species with the southwestern pond turtle (Actinemys pallida) and called ‘Emys marmorata’. Then both species were renamed ‘Clemmys marmorata’. The northwestern and southwestern groups were more recently split into two species based on genetic and physical differences between them. So, you may read our local turtles described with different common and scientific names depending on when the document was published (3). But no matter when it was published, there is only one native freshwater turtle known to the Klamath Mountains and the current name is “northwestern pond turtle” (Actinemys marmorata).  

Photo: A female northwestern pond turtle. [Don Ashton] 

Actinemys marmorata 

actin = ray or beam // emys = turtle // marmorata = marbled

As its common name suggests, the northwestern pond turtle is known to inhabit ponds and lakes, but within the Klamath Mountain ecosystem they are commonly associated with riverine habitats. Northwestern pond turtles are poikilothermic, meaning that they regulate their temperature by basking in the sun when they are cold, and seek cool water or shade when they are too warm. They distribute in sunny, slow water reaches with boulder lined pools that, importantly, have connectivity to broad floodplain habitat (5, p. 353).

A male Northwestern Pond Turtle in underwater refugia on the Southfork Trinity River. [Don Ashton]

The northwestern pond turtle has an acute sense of sight and low-frequency hearing, and while they are often seen basking in the sun above water, they will quickly retreat when they feel threatened (5). Reader, a river enthusiast we surmise, we are sure you’ve witnessed the sound of a plopping western pond turtle off a river log – but did you see them? 

Male turtles are known to migrate from river to upland areas to overwinter in riparian shrubs or leaf litter. This trait is not ubiquitous among all turtles as some choose to stay close to their summer habitat by overwintering in banks near the river or pond. Local herpetologist Don Ashton of McBain Associates/Riverbend Sciences has spent decades studying turtles in the Trinity River and said, “Turtles are very smart animals, they tend to migrate close to the high water line (think 100 year floodplain) but over time we have found that in comparison with North Fork Trinity River populations, turtles on the mainstem are found more frequently hibernating and nesting in lower elevation areas, likely due to adaptation of minimized flooding by Trinity and Lewiston Dams.”

In addition to migration for hibernation and summering, female turtles migrate twice for nesting. When they are ready to lay their eggs, they fill their bladders and set off on a slow but steady journey to upland areas to dig their nests. Once in a satisfactory location, the female turtle wets the ground with her urine to help soften it for digging. Once her eggs are laid, she will journey back to her summer habitat.

A Northwestern pond turtle nest, predated. Egg fragments and plug are identified. [Don Ashton]

Migration to upland areas for nesting or hibernation can often lead to chance encounters with humans or their vehicles. If you happen to cross paths with a turtle, Ashton advises to leave them to their journey, “they are not lost” Ashton declares. However, if their location poses a risk of vehicular homicide, and you feel compelled to move them, point them in the direction of their path. That is unless the turtle happens to urinate while being handled, then, Ashton suggests, they should be pointed back toward a water source.

These ancient creatures are small to medium in size, growing up to 8 inches long. Interestingly, Trinity River turtles have been documented as even smaller than their regional counterparts. Some herpetologists surmise this could be due to temperature suppression caused by elevated dam releases causing cold water releases in the latter spring and summer months (6). Watch Don Ashton’s 2024 Trinity River Restoration Program Science Symposium presentation on the subject below.

Don Ashton, Senior Aquatic Herpetologist/Ecologist for McBain Associates/Applied River Sciences presents, “Frogs and Turtles informing flow management and river restoration.” at the 2024 Trinity River Restoration Program Science Symposium.

Their dark brown or olive-colored shells often feature fine, lighter markings that give them a marbled look as reflected in their species name, marmorata.  Their low profile and coloring help them blend in with riverbanks, keeping them safe from predators like raccoons, skunks, and birds of prey. The male northwestern pond turtle can be identified with a pointier snout and lighter pale cream coloring under its neck. If you encounter a turtle with hints of red near the ear it is likely a non-invasive red-eared slider, make note of where you are and if possible, provide photo documentation to the Trinity River Restoration Program or the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Documentation of these instances can help in protecting our native turtle populations.

image

Unlike many reptiles, northwestern pond turtles grow slowly. They start out about the size of a quarter. Females don’t start laying eggs until they’re between 8-10 years old (3, 7, 8). They lay between 3 and 13 eggs, which incubate through the summer. In some parts of Northern California, hatchlings stay in the nest through winter, emerging the following spring. In the photo you can see a comparison of a female turtle at 55 years old with a newly hatched turtle. Ashton, in the background mentioned that the elder at age 55 was carrying 9 eggs at the time of that photo (2018) which suggests their lifespan may be quite long. Ashton mentioned, “it is certainly possible that there are turtles living in the mainstem that have lived there since before the dam was placed.”

Photo: A female, marked and recaptured and aged at 55 years old in comparison with a hatchling. Held by Bruce Bury and Don Ashton smiles from the back in 2018. [Jamie Bettaso]

The northwestern pond turtle has been studied locally for over 50 years due to the diligence of herpetologist Bruce Bury, now retired from USGS, who monitored northwestern pond turtles starting in 1968 while earning his Ph.D. at UC Berkeley. He marked turtles with an identifying notch in a tributary of the South Fork Trinity River, allowing for scientists to track longevity on the only native species known in the Klamath Range (5, p. 354). Although Bury has documented turtles over 50 years old, northwestern pond turtle longevity is still being studied today.

The northwestern pond turtle is commonly seen in the Trinity River, but its population has been declining throughout its west coast range. This decline is so severe that in 2023 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to list the northwestern pond turtle as a “Threatened” species (8, 11). Habitat loss, hydrologic alterations and invasive species are a few human caused threats to northwestern pond turtles. The state of California also recognizes the northwestern pond turtle as a species of “special concern”. As such, handling these turtles requires permitting and are considered illegal to keep as pets.

The Trinity River Restoration Program has been involved in research to identify and address some of these threats. A graduate student from Cal Poly Humboldt, Leah Sloan, determined that non-native bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) eat young northwestern pond turtle hatchlings to the detriment of their populations along the Trinity River (10). Bullfrogs prefer off-channel ponds, which are perfect areas for northwestern pond turtles to grow. Bullfrogs require perennial ponds to reproduce because their tadpoles take longer than one year to grow (and the mainstem Trinity River is too cold and swift to support bullfrogs year-round), so ponds that normally dry out won’t support bullfrogs permanently. Seasonal drying isn’t much of a concern to turtles because they can simply walk to the river when their home dries up. This is one recommendation for the Program to consider when rehabilitating a site.

A trail camera captures a female northwestern pond turtle basking on a log. [Don Ashton]

Today, turtle researchers and wildlife managers are still learning more about turtle behaviors and how to change management to better serve the northwestern pond turtle in the Trinity River region. From size and aging to nesting sites and travel patterns, each discovery helps build a clearer picture of what these turtles need to thrive.

References

  1. Scientific and Common Names of the Reptiles and Amphibians of North America – Explained © Ellin Beltz
  2. Holland DC. 1994. The Western Pond Turtle: Habitat and History.
  3. Bury, R.B., Welsh, H.H., Germano, D.J., and Ashton, D.T. (eds). 2012. Western Pond Turtle: Biology, Sampling Techniques, Inventory and Monitoring, Conservation, and Management. Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology, Northwest Fauna, Number 7. 128 pp. 
  4. Shaffer H.B., Scott, P.A., 2019. Assessment for the Western Pond Turtle. Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service by University of California, Los Angeles.
  5. Kauffmann, M. Garwood, J. The Klamath Mountains: a Natural History. 2022. p. 353-354.
  6. Ashton, Don & Bettaso, Jamie & Welsh, Hartwell. (2015). Changes across a Decade in Size, Growth, and Body Condition of Western Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) Populations on Free-flowing and Regulated Forks of the Trinity River in Northwest California. Copeia. volume 103. 621-633. 10.1643/CP-15-253.
  7. California Herps – Northwestern Pond Turtle – Actinemys marmorata
  8. Wikipedia – Western Pond Turtle
  9. https://www.fws.gov/press-release/2023-09/us-fish-and-wildlife-service-proposes-federal-protections-both-species
  10. Sloan L, Marks S. 2012. Summary of Management Implications for the Project on Western Pond Turtles (Actinemys marmorata) in Lentic Habitats Along the Trinity River, California. Report to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Trinity River Restoration Program, from Humboldt State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Arcata, CA. Available: https://www.trrp.net/library/document?id=1819.
  11. Endangered and Threatened Species: Status with Section 4(d) Rule for the Northwestern Pond Turtle and Southwestern Pond Turtle. Posted by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Apr 4, 2024.

Trinity River Watershed Monitoring

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Steelhead Report Card Dashboard

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) tracks steelhead angler effort and success through a reporting program. This reporting program consists of a mandatory report card that all steelhead anglers need to have in their possession while fishing. Anglers record each day that they fish, where they fish, how many fish they catch, and whether those fish are from a hatchery (determined by the lack of an adipose fin, which is removed by hatchery staff before the fish is released), or were spawned in the wild (determined by the presence of an adipose fin).

Each year, anglers are required to send these report cards back to CDFW, either physically or by entering the information online.

After many years of collecting data, CDFW recently released a compilation of raw summary data for the period of 2012-2023 (linked here). The data set can be sorted by area (the Trinity River is one of 20 river systems or regions), season, or month, and shows the numbers of fishing trips, the number of hatchery steelhead caught, and the number of wild steelhead caught.

The Klamath River and tributaries (except the Trinity River) stands out as an exceptional fishery. The Trinity River is not too far behind it among the 20 steelhead fisheries in the state.

It’s important to understand that while the raw data is informative, it is only a starting point toward understanding the fisheries. For example, in many systems, including the Trinity, hatchery production has changed substantially over the time period that the dashboard shows. Some hatcheries have reduced steelhead production by as much as 40%, which has an obvious bearing on the average number of steelhead caught per trip. Conversely, this data set covers two of the most severe droughts that Northern California has ever experienced. Droughts can leave the smaller tributary streams, which are usually off-limits to fishing because steelhead prefer to spawn in smaller streams, too dry for fish to migrate into. So, they remain in the mainstem river where people can catch them more readily than in normal or wetter years when they would have migrated into their spawning streams earlier. Tribal harvest methods, too, have changed in this time period and are much more selective for hatchery steelhead (identified by their lack of an adipose fin) over wild steelhead.

Still, this dashboard can be very useful for planning where and when to go on a steelhead fishing trip. And steelhead anglers should be happy to see the data that they carefully record and report is going to good use!